Deepwater Sector In Deep Trouble

Oil majors’ exit from pricey Gulf of Mexico projects, amid dozens of deferrals in deepwater exploration and production, is leaving the sector high and dry.

Drilling activity in the deepest parts of the world’s waters can yield tremendous oil volumes, but exploring thousands of feet below sea level is also the most expensive of energy’s high tech endeavors. And in an environment of $30 oil, investment in deepwater production is pouring out.

Beyond a rebound in oil prices, recovery of the deepwater sector could take an additional two years, Sajjad Alam, senior vice president at Moody’s Investors Service told Rigzone.

Matt Fox

Executive VP for E&P, ConocoPhillips

And some companies are opting to not even try to make deepwater work. In an Oct. 29 earnings call with analysts, ConocoPhillips Executive Vice President for Exploration and Production Matt Fox said one of the company’s largest assets includes 2.2 million acres in the Gulf of Mexico, which includes three existing discoveries. But the supermajor made it clear the company won’t be drilling there.

“This is a strategic decision to leave – to exit deepwater exploration,” he said.   

ConocoPhillips isn’t the only deepwater investor reconsidering its options. In a January 2016 report, Wood Mackenzie (Wood Mac) noted that 22 major projects worth 7 billion barrels of oil equivalent (Bboe) in commercial reserves have been delayed during the last six months. That’s in addition to the deferral of 46 developments and 20 Bboe in reserves the research firm identified last June. All told, that’s 68 major projects to develop and 27 Bboe put on hold.

“The impact on future production is significant,” Wood Mac wrote. “And with oil prices dipping to new lows at the start of 2016 and capital allocation tightening, the list will continue to grow.”

Of those projects, deepwater accounts for more than half of the new project deferrals. The sector’s high project breakeven rates, enormous capital requirements and relative inflexibility combined to make it unpalatable.

Sajjad Alam

Senior VP,
Moody’s Investors Service

All of which will lead to a necessary dip in supply, said James West, senior managing director at Evercore ISI.

“This cancellation of projects is going to leave us a gap in future production, which we will eventually need,” he told Rigzone. “We may find ourselves in a really tight spot in a few years from now as this excess oil supply gets soaked up and we’re needing incremental supply ... As we cancel more of these projects, it can actually help the oil market out because it does take the future supply off the market, [which] should be able to sniff out that we’re going to get tighter, faster.”   

Taking Debt, Losing Credit

But as Alam noted, things will get worse for offshore drillers before they improve.

“The worst is yet to come from a credit perspective, in terms of where drillers are today versus where they will most likely end up over time. The reason being [that] in the offshore drilling space, deterioration happens gradually because of the contractual protection that benefits drillers,” he said. “As these contracts expire, they will be looking at much lower day rates, and many of their rigs may not even be re-contracted.”

As a result, the revenue stream dries up, margins continue to compress, and rig companies find themselves in a world in which they had a capital structure built for certain day rates [and] certain asset values, he said.

“Now, asset valuation has come down dramatically. Day rates have come down dramatically. So their debt level is going to look very high, relative to their cash flows,” Alam explained.

Consequently, Moody’s lowered ratings gradually to account for increasing credit risk. After downgrading most offshore drillers in October 2014, the investors’ service intends to again review offshore drillers for further downgrade.

North American Deepwater Utilization; Source: RigLogix