Newsom Proposes Limit on Oil Refining Margins

California Governor Gavin Newsom proposed to limit the profits of oil companies operating in the state by curbing their gross refining margins, following a year in which gasoline prices there have soared record levels.
The proposal leaves out specific acceptable margin rates for oil refiners and the penalties they would pay on amounts over that margin, using the term penalty, not tax. The margin would be adjusted annually.
“Either Big Oil reins in the profits and prices, or they’ll pay a penalty,” Newsom said Monday in a statement.
BREAKING: We just announced America’s first price gouging penalty on big oil.
We will not be gaslit by oil companies that are keeping gas prices high while they rake in record profits.
Time for them to answer for ripping you off.
— Gavin Newsom (@GavinNewsom) December 5, 2022
Newsom began a crusade against oil companies during his reelection campaign as fuel prices in the state skyrocketed. As suppliers reported record third-quarter profits in October, Newsom’s campaign issued a series of statements excoriating each major refiner by name for “ripping off” California consumers.
Democratic state Senator Nancy Skinner said she introduced the governor’s proposal in a bill on the first day of a special legislative session called by Newsom to begin public debate, providing more detail to Newsom’s previously announced plans to pursue the idea.
The bill would expand the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission’s authority to investigate the gasoline industry, including seeking information about pricing, supply contracts and refinery maintenance schedules.
The energy commission and California Department of Tax and Fee Administration would investigate factors behind gas prices, uncover pricing irregularities in the California market and their effect on tax revenue, and report findings to the governor and Legislature.
Penalties would go into a Price Gouging Penalty Fund that would be returned as refunds to residents.
Fuel suppliers, including Marathon Petroleum Corp. and Valero Energy Corp., were criticized by California regulators for not showing up to a hearing last week on the gasoline price surge. PBF Energy Inc. cited Newsom’s “politicization” of the issue and release of “misleading information” among reasons to not participate in the hearing.
During the hearing, the Chief Executive Officer of the Western States Petroleum Association Catherine Reheis-Boyd said refiners’ profits are mostly in line with companies in the S&P 500 index and that high gasoline costs in California reflect policies that discourage production.
“Year after year we adopt regulations and policies that have both prevented needed energy infrastructure from being built in the state, and we send signals to the market that has significantly curtailed investment in refining and production capacity,” Reheis-Boyd said.
Representatives from Marathon Petroleum, Valero, Phillips 66 and PBF Energy Inc. didn’t immediately respond to a comment request.
--With assistance from Gerson Freitas Jr.
What do you think? We’d love to hear from you, join the conversation on the
Rigzone Energy Network.
The Rigzone Energy Network is a new social experience created for you and all energy professionals to Speak Up about our industry, share knowledge, connect with peers and industry insiders and engage in a professional community that will empower your career in energy.
- Oil Prices Have Been in Turbulent Downtrend Since Mid-2022
- UK Prime Minister Creates New Energy Security Dept
- How Critical Is Cyber Security for Offshore Oil and Gas Installations?
- Warmer Start To 2023 Drops US Natural Gas Price Forecast
- Calls For New Global Profits Windfall Taxes Are Misleading, OEUK Said
- Chinese Wind Companies Set For Expansion
- USA EIA Reveals Latest Oil Price Forecast
- US Gas Producers Looking To Diversify With LNG Exports
- India Rushes to Long-Term LNG Deals
- 3 Climate Takeaways From Biden's Second State of the Union
- Shell CEO Says World 'Desperately In Need' Of Natural Gas
- Fate Of $8Bn Alaska Oil Project To Be Resolved In Next 30 Days
- What Would War-End Mean for Global Oil and Gas?
- OPEC+ Exports Show Russia Surges While Saudi Arabia Dials Back
- Gov't Tampering Puts Australian Gas Market In Unenviable Position
- Fed Will Be One Of The Leading Oil Price Drivers in 2023
- Signs of Progress at Freeport LNG
- Oil Posts Second Weekly Loss as Stockpiles Swell
- Lukoil Hits 50 Million Tons Of Hydrocarbon Production In Caspian Sea
- Texas Power Outages Increase As Ice Storm Persists
- Valaris Employee Reported Missing from Rig
- Gasoline and Diesel Prices Expected to Fall
- New SPR Bill Passes House
- Is the USA Shale Boom Over?
- Higher Oil Prices Have Not Led to More Exploration
- Shell Finds Gas In Pensacola High-Impact Well Off UK
- Iran Oil Gushes Into Global Market
- What Bad Habits Should Oil and Gas Jobseekers Avoid?
- Will Oil Hit $100 Per Barrel in 2023?
- Eni, Chevron Make Significant Gas Discovery Off Egypt