Exxon Avoiding Tankers That Previously Transported Russian Oil

Exxon Mobil Corp. is avoiding hiring oil tankers that previously carried cargoes from Russia, putting itself in the same camp as Shell Plc with a move that pressures owners to choose whether to serve Moscow’s interests or not.
The largest oil company in the US began asking that, from Dec. 5, shipowners must ensure the tankers on lease to Exxon haven’t carried crude cargoes which are either Russian, originated in Russia, or come from a person connected with Russia, a clause seen by Bloomberg shows. Failure to do so would allow Exxon to terminate the charter.
A spokeswoman for Exxon declined to comment.
The approach is similar to that of Shell, whose first preference is for ships that haven’t carried Russian crude in their last three cargoes.
Moves by such big firms only increase the pressure on owners to choose between serving Russian and non-Russian interests.
Shipping firms intending to transport the nation’s barrels can already only get industry standard insurance and an array of other G-7 services if the cargoes they’re hauling cost $60 a barrel or less. The measures included a clause that if companies pay above $60 then they can’t access key EU services for the transportation of Russian cargoes for 90 days.
The Exxon clause doesn’t apply to Kazakhstan’s CPC oil, so long as the seller isn’t Russian or connected with Russia, and a Kazakh certificate of origin is received.
Exxon’s mandate expands from Feb. 5, 2023 to Russian oil products, with the same exception as above. That’s when further G-7 sanctions will kick in, affecting refined fuel markets.
The Group of Seven’s measures have triggered the emergence of a so-called dark fleet of tankers that are expected to be dedicated to servicing Russia’s interests. Moves like Exxon’s and Shell’s make it harder for those vessels to return to non-Russian business.
--With assistance from Kevin Crowley.
WHAT DO YOU THINK?
Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.
- Further OPEC+ Production Cuts Are Still on the Table
- USA Steel Major Taps ExxonMobil for Carbon Capture
- India to Boost Renewables Capacity, Avoid New Coal Plants
- Aramco Holds Talks with Turkish Firms on $50B Planned Projects
- Chevron to Have Wastewater Pipeline for Permian Operation
- Kinder Morgan to Expand Gas Capacity at Texas Gulf Coast Facility
- ADNOC Drilling Beefs Up Hybrid Land Rig Fleet
- QatarEnergy to Supply Bangladesh with LNG under 15-Year Deal
- Woodside Awards Contracts for Decommissioning of Australia Fields
- Hourly Pay for Shale Workers Tops $43
- Which Generation Is Most in Demand in Oil, Gas Right Now?
- Is There a Danger That Oil and Gas Runs out of Financing?
- North America Rig Count Reduction Rumbles On
- Exxon and Chevron Shareholders Reject Toughening Climate Goals
- Will the World Hit Net Zero by 2050?
- Analyst Flags USA-Made Oil, Gas Field Machinery Order Trend
- Kenya Airways Becomes First African Airline to Fly on Eni's SAF
- Canada Gas Output Rebounds as Wildfires Subside: S&P Global
- ConocoPhillips Preempts TotalEnergies' Sale of Surmont
- NOAA Reveals Outlook for 2023 Atlantic Hurricane Season
- Who Is the Most Prolific Private Oil and Gas Producer in the USA?
- USA EIA Slashes 2023 and 2024 Brent Oil Price Forecasts
- BMI Reveals Latest Brent Oil Price Forecasts
- OPEC+ Has Lots of Dry Powder for Further Cuts
- Which Generation Is Most in Demand in Oil, Gas Right Now?
- Could the Oil Price Crash in 2023?
- Is There a Danger That Oil and Gas Runs out of Financing?
- Invictus Strikes Oil, Gas in Zimbabwe
- BMI Projects Gasoline Price Through to 2026
- What Will World Oil Demand Be in 2023?