Courts Confirm That Wells Fargo Botched Occidental Stock Sale

Courts Confirm That Wells Fargo Botched Occidental Stock Sale
Wells Fargo bungled the 2020 sale of Occidental Petroleum shares on behalf of an employee trust, leading to millions of dollars in losses.

Wells Fargo & Co. bungled the 2020 sale of Occidental Petroleum Corp. shares on behalf of an employee trust, leading to millions of dollars in losses when the bank failed to execute trades as planned before the Covid-19 pandemic tanked the stock market, a judge in Texas ruled.

US District Judge Lee Rosenthal of Houston said she will decide later how much the bank must pay Occidental in damages, after lawyers provide more detail on losses suffered by the energy company’s so-called rabbi trust, which was used to compensate certain executives.

The value of the assets held in the trust was “$39.4 million less than they would have been had the stock been sold according to the parties’ agreement,” Rosenthal said in a 38-page ruling handed down Wednesday. The judge indicated the final damage award may be higher because Occidental claims it lost the opportunity to invest the cash it had hoped to receive.

Wells Fargo didn’t dispute the share sale failed to go according to plan. But the bank disagrees with the impact on its client. A spokesperson for Wells Fargo didn’t immediately return messages seeking comment.

The bank had agreed in December 2019 to sell equal daily tranches of 381,420 shares for a week, beginning Jan. 6, 2020, when prices were around $45 to $47 a share, court filings show. An employee who’d never handled such a large transaction sold 381,420 shares on one day in January and sold no shares at all on three of the planned days, records show.

By early March, Occidental’s shares were near $11 a share. On March 20, two months after the agreed sale period, the bank dumped 1.1 million shares in a bulk transaction, driving the company’s shares to $9.98. That kind of price collapse was what the oil company had hoped to avoid through a staged sale that didn’t flood the market with shares.

Rosenthal also denied Wells Fargo’s bid to shift at least some of the blame to Occidental and its custodial intermediary, which also mishandled aspects of the planned share sale. The judge gave the parties until Sept. 9 to outline how she should proceed.

The case is Occidental Petroleum v. Wells Fargo, 4:21-1126, US District Court, Southern District of Texas (Houston).



WHAT DO YOU THINK?


Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.


MORE FROM THIS AUTHOR
Bloomberg