Trump May Have to Boost Biofuel as Court Deals Blow to Oil

Trump May Have to Boost Biofuel as Court Deals Blow to Oil
The Trump administration may have to reconsider its proposal from earlier this month to curb biofuel use.

(Bloomberg) -- The Trump administration may have to reconsider its proposal from earlier this month to curb biofuel use after a U.S. appeals court in Washington ruled that the Environmental Protection Agency doesn’t have the authority to cut quotas while citing inadequate domestic supply.

Issued Friday, the unanimous ruling by a three-judge panel comes amid conflicting legal challenges to actions taken by the EPA. Some factions claim the agency set renewable fuel requirements too high, while others said they’re too low. Shares of ethanol producers rose on the news while refinery stocks declined.

U.S. Circuit Judge Brett Kavanaugh wrote that EPA isn’t allowed "to consider the volume of renewable fuel that is available to ultimate consumers or the demand-side constraints that affect the consumption of renewable fuel by consumers.”

The ethanol industry hailed the court’s move as a victory. Earlier this month, the Trump administration issued a proposal that for the first time would cut the amount of renewables that must be blended into the fuel supply under a 12-year-old law known as the Renewable Fuel Standard.

The court ruling is a blow to oil refiners, including billionaire Carl Icahn, who have argued that there are constraints to blending the fuels into petroleum. The American Petroleum Institute said in a statement it was "disappointed" with the court’s decision, which the trade group said highlighted the need for congressional action to reform the renewable fuel standard -- a move congressional analysts have said is unlikely to happen.

“We are still reviewing the decision, but the fact the court has affirmed our position that EPA abused its general waiver authority by including factors such as demand and infrastructure in a waiver intended to be based solely on available supply is a great victory for consumers and the RFS program," said Bob Dinneen, the chief executive officer of the Renewable Fuels Association, an ethanol industry trade group.

The EPA didn’t respond to a request for comment. In a July 5 statement, the agency, which administers the program, said that the proposal was “consistent with market realities focused on actual production and consumer demand while being cognizant of the challenges that exist in bringing advanced biofuels into the marketplace.”

“This is pretty huge,” said Gene Gebolys, CEO of biofuel producer World Energy Alternatives LLC. “This gives the Trump administration clear guidance on what the legislative branch intended when they passed the law and what the judicial branch meant when they upheld the law.”

Green Plains Inc., one of the biggest U.S. ethanol producers, rose 1.3 percent to $19.70 at 12:44 p.m. in New York. CVR Energy Inc., an independent oil refiner that counts Carl Icahn as its biggest investor, slumped 3.8 percent.

Renewable Identification Numbers (RINs), biofuel credits that track 2017 ethanol consumption quotas, rose 1.2 percent to 82 cents apiece, the highest in a week, data compiled by Bloomberg show.

Growth Energy, a coalition of biofuel producers, called the decision "a major win for consumers." 

“We’re very pleased with the court’s ruling, which restores Congressional intent and will ensure that renewable fuels continue to play a growing and important role in America’s fuel mix,” Growth Energy Chief Executive Officer Emily Skor said in a statement. "We appreciate the court recognizing the value of the RFS, and we look forward to working with the EPA to make sure that America’s biofuel targets reflect the goals set down in law.”

The Biotechnology Innovation Organization, which represents companies such as DuPont Co. and Novozymes A/S also applauded the move. 

“BIO and its members are pleased that the Court agreed with us that EPA’s flawed methodology would have allowed the oil industry to control the volumes of renewable fuels offered to consumers," BIO Chief Executive Officer Jim Greenwood said in a statement. "BIO has consistently said that the RFS statute does not allow EPA to rely on demand-side factors under the oil industry’s control as a basis for setting annual volumes."


View Full Article


Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.