Pipeline Pinch Adds to Oil-Sands Woes as Keystone Wait Drags

Pipeline Pinch Adds to Oil-Sands Woes as Keystone Wait Drags
Producers have little choice but to move those extra barrels by train, with costs two to three times higher than pipeline shipping.

(Bloomberg) -- Call it the pipeline pinch, or maybe the Keystone quagmire.

While plans by Canadian companies from Suncor Energy Inc. to Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. to boost oil output are racing to fruition, the construction of three pipelines needed to move that product to market, including the infamous Keystone XL, is lagging years behind.

The end result: Producers have little choice but to move those extra barrels by train, with costs two to three times higher than pipeline shipping. It’s an unwelcome added expense after oil plunged about 20 percent from this year’s peak. Futures prices have settled in below $45 a barrel, after many predicted it would rise to $60.

“We’re not going to see significant new pipeline capacity until late 2019 or 2020,” said Nick Schultz, vice president for pipelines and regulatory matters at the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers. In the meantime, the extra expense for shipping “impacts royalties and other things that impact the public.”

During the Barack Obama administration, oil-sands producers feared a future when they would have to rely heavily on costly railway shipments if he didn’t approve Keystone XL. That may start this year.

Pipelines in Western Canada, which holds the world’s third-largest oil reserves, can carry about 3.3 million barrels of crude a day, according to CAPP. Meanwhile, the area is expected to produce 3.92 million barrels a day this year and 4.2 million next year as a number of large oil-sands projects come online.

The looming bottleneck adds a new urgency to the industry’s calls for more capacity and may lend credence to its argument that the lack of lines hurts the nation’s economy.

More Expensive

Canadian oil producers have long lamented the dearth of pipelines carrying their supplies to the nation’s east and west coasts, saying that the situation leaves them able to export only to the U.S. and forces them to accept whatever price American refiners will pay. Environmentalists in Canada and the U.S. have opposed new or expanded pipelines, arguing that burning the crude locked up in the oil sands would contribute to catastrophic global warming.

The industry saw glimmers of hope last year, when government regulators approved expansions of Kinder Morgan Inc.’s Trans Mountain pipeline linking Alberta’s oil sands with export facilities on British Columbia’s Pacific Coast as well as Enbridge Inc.’s Line 3 running from Hardisty, Alberta, to the U.S. border in Manitoba. The pipeline situation got another boost when U.S. President Donald Trump approved TransCanada Corp.’s Keystone XL, which spans from the oil sands to the U.S. Gulf Coast. Kinder Morgan this month entered into credit agreements totaling C$5.5 billion ($4.2 billion) to help fund the development of Trans Mountain.

More Hurdles

Yet, Keystone still needs to win approvals from regulators in Nebraska, and the Line 3 project has faced delays that pushed its in-service date back to 2019. The fate of Trans Mountain also has been called into question after opponents of the project won power in British Columbia last month.

Meanwhile, there are a handful of massive new oil projects that will start production this year and next. Suncor’s Fort Hills oil-sands project is expected to begin production in the fourth quarter and ramp up to about 90 percent of its capacity of 194,000 barrels a day within 12 months. Canadian Natural plans to complete another phase of expansion at its Horizon mine this year that will add 80,000 barrels a day.

While Suncor has pipeline space reserved for output from Fort Hills, the company believes market access is important to Canada’s oil producers and its economy, said Sneh Seetal, a spokeswoman. Canadian Natural isn’t concerned with transportation of Horizon’s production because the operation produces light oil, which has fewer shipping constraints, said spokeswoman Julie Woo.

“Though transportation of crude oil by pipeline is our current and primary method of shipment, we evaluate and monitor on an ongoing basis where crude by rail has been, and will continue to be, an option,” Woo said. 

Offshore Project

More oil will be produced outside of Western Canada as well. The Hebron project off the coast of Newfoundland and Labrador also is expected to come online this year. Operated by Exxon Mobil Corp. with investments by Chevron Corp., Suncor, Statoil ASA and Nalcor Energy Corp., Hebron is expected to have crude oil production capacity of 150,000 barrels a day at its peak.


View Full Article


Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.