US Crude Oil Production Boost On Collision Course With OPEC Cuts

US Crude Oil Production Boost On Collision Course With OPEC Cuts
Subdued production in 2017 may give way to crude production boost of 1 million barrels per day by 2018 as US exploration and production companies reveal plans to spend more cash.

Armed with $50-plus oil prices, exploration and production (E&P) companies aren’t wasting any time.

As the fourth quarter 2016 earnings season comes to a close, a key trend to emerge is that U.S. E&Ps are planning to spend more than analysts expected this year.

Capital spending (CAPEX) tracking at 8 percent higher than consensus estimates, according to information from Wells Fargo (WF). That reflects capital budgets today that are 53 percent higher than 2016 levels.

And that extra cash could generate as much as 1 million more barrels of oil per day next year, analysts at Simmons & Company International, said.

For its part, OPEC has suggested the United States should consider its own production cuts – not increases. In November, the organization pledged cuts to help rebalance the market; soon afterward, several non-OPEC nations – including Russia – followed suit.

Oil prices react daily to U.S. drilling activity, losing ground when domestic increases overshadow OPEC and non-OPEC cuts, who are on track to meet reduction goals. Member nations of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and their non-OPEC counterparts agreed last year to remove almost 1.8 million barrels per day (MMbpd) from the market beginning last month. To date, they have met 1.5 MMbpd of the goal.

In the United States, about 40 E&Ps and large integrated companies that Simmons covers account for roughly 50 percent of current domestic production; of those companies, more than 70 percent have released guidance that suggests production growth in the mid-single digits this year and low double-digits in 2018, Simmons said.

“We believe investors need to begin entertaining the possibility of 1 million barrels per day of oil production growth in 2018,” the analysts wrote.

Coming into 2017, those estimates were closer to 700,000 barrels per day (bpd) and the higher volumes were expected in 2019 – not a year early.

“The tension will be the ongoing contest and collision of U.S. vitality juxtaposed against international non-OPEC stagnation and the durability of OPEC's return to rational guardianship,” Simmons said. “We continue to be impressed by an industry that has driven the cost curve dramatically lower from a few years ago and is now capable of delivering double digit oil production growth in a lower commodity environment.”

But that equates to a production outlook at that is “good for the companies; not as good for the macro,” the analysts said.

Not everyone is convinced.

Analysts at R.W. Baird & Co. said exploration and production companies are leaning in with an optimistic outlook on crude this year, but investors remain wary.

“Higher spend is driving higher growth outlooks,” the analysts wrote in a research note Tuesday. “However, growing cash needs are creating a negative sentiment shift as cautious investors hold a ‘prove it to me’ attitude, with skeptical views” of second-half growth guidance.

A chunk of the new spending this year will fund increased service costs. Analysts have said service costs are poised to increase between 5 and 15 percent.

And while production is set to increase next year, for 2017, guidance is about 1 percent lower than consensus expectations, analysts at Wells Fargo said in a recent note. The dominant theme WF identified appears to be a “deliberate attempt by operators to shift the focus away from 2017,” and instead, they highlight growth targets for 2018 and beyond.

“We also see more inherent risk in future (vs. immediate) production combining poorly with a macro environment that remains volatile and uncertain,” WF said.



WHAT DO YOU THINK?


Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

Captiion Obvious  |  March 02, 2017
The U.S. is the new swing producer. When theres oversupply U.S. drilling activity declines. Conversely, the U.S. can ramp up very quickly when prices rebound. This is the new reality. Most OPEC and non OPEC countries cant afford low oil prices any more than the U.S. oil companies. The major difference is our GDP is not nearly as weighted as theirs. Therefore, they must curtail production to maintain stability in pricing. Near term, prices will likely range between $40-$55 for the next several years. The Middle East no longer carries the power it once did.
john weaver  |  March 02, 2017
OPEC answers to only themselves, others answer to stock holders and investors. Let Texas lead the way ,Others will follow . That way they can pay their bills
Timothy Williams  |  March 02, 2017
Dear All, I thing that all counties that product oil should not participate in the cuts, the US will destroy the stability of the prices if they continue, and it seem they are not looking at this as critical matter. As I remember when the prices were at $ 30 per/bbl, the activities had halted and cause thousand of people to loose there jobs. There needs to be some reality in what will happen. If this is the plan that


Most Popular Articles