Source: US Justice Dept Will Sue To Stop Halliburton, Baker Hughes Merger
April 5 (Reuters) - The U.S. Justice Department will file a lawsuit as soon as this week to stop oilfield services provider Halliburton Co from acquiring smaller rival Baker Hughes Inc, a source familiar with the matter said on Tuesday.
Since the deal to combine the No. 2 and No. 3 oil services companies was first announced in November 2014, oil prices have fallen by more than 55 percent.
The combined company would overtake Schlumberger NV as the world's largest oilfield services provider, fueling concern about higher prices for customers.
Faced with opposition from antitrust regulators at the Justice Department, the companies may either opt to cancel the planned tie-up or fight the government in court.
Share prices for Baker Hughes closed down 5.1 percent at $39.36 late Tuesday afternoon while Halliburton ended up 1.2 percent at $34.40.
Halliburton and Baker Hughes both declined comment on Tuesday.
The two sides had been discussing asset sales aimed at saving the deal, which was originally valued at $35 billion when it was first announced but is now valued at about $25 billion based on the decline in Halliburton shares.
In January, Halliburton told regulators it was prepared to sell assets with combined 2013 revenue of $5.2 billion to win antitrust approval.
If the deal collapses due to antitrust concerns, Halliburton must pay Baker Hughes a $3.5 billion breakup fee, according to regulatory filings.
The proposed deal has also hit headwinds in Europe, where the European Union's competition authority was concerned that the proposed merger would reduce competition and innovation in more than 30 product markets, both offshore and onshore.
Regulators in Australia have also flagged concerns about the massive tie-up.
As far back as July 2015, Reuters reported that a source said there were concerns among U.S. antitrust enforcers that the tie-up would lead to higher prices and less innovation.
The Justice Department's worry at that time focused on two areas, the source said. One was that the drilling technology businesses that were divested would go to small companies that could not effectively compete with the two leaders. The other was that the leaders would have less incentive to innovate.
Much of the oilfield service industry relies on aggressive competition on the technological front, and it appears the Justice Department was concerned the tie-up would cause the newly combined company to cool its laboratory activities.
Baker Hughes in particular has been extremely aggressive in developing new oilfield technologies, part of its appeal to Halliburton from the beginning. For instance, Baker Hughes developed smartphone apps that help its customers in the field decide in real time how best to hydraulically fracture new wells.
In any case, uniting Halliburton and Baker Hughes would create a dominant leader in North Dakota with more than half the cementing market and a leading position in fracking.
Lower oil prices had given investors hope that the companies' best path forward was together, especially as demand for their products and services evaporate as customers slashed budgets.
Shareholders of Baker Hughes and Halliburton had voiced support for the merger, essentially a defensive move in response to clients slashing their exploration and production budgets because of tumbling oil prices.
(Reporting by Diane Bartz and Ernest Scheyder; Additional reporting by Amrutha Gayathri; Editing by Diane Craft)
WHAT DO YOU THINK?
Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.
- Weatherford CEO's Rebound Plan Relies On Getting Smaller
- Iran Says Oil Market Is Too Tight For US Zero Exports Target
- China's Squeezed 'Teapots' Eye Petchem Path To Riches
- Baker Hughes: US Drillers Add Oil Rigs For Second Week In Three
- Venezuela Hands China More Oil Presence, But No Mention Of New Funds
- Falcon Oil Declares Commercial Flow Test Results for Shenandoah Well
- Macquarie Strategists Expect Brent Oil Price to Grind Higher
- Japan Failing to Meet Corporate Demand for Clean Power: Amazon
- UK Oil Regulator Publishes New Emissions Reduction Plan
- Pennsylvania County Joins List of Local Govts Suing Big Oil over Climate
- PetroChina Posts Higher Annual Profit on Higher Production
- US, SKorea Launch Task Force to Stop Illicit Refined Oil Flows into NKorea
- McDermott Settles Reficar Dispute
- Russian Navy Enters Warship-Crowded Red Sea Amid Houthi Attacks
- USA Commercial Crude Oil Inventories Increase
- New China Climate Chief Says Fossil Fuels Must Keep a Role
- Oil Demand Outpaces Expectations, Testing Calculus on Peak Crude
- House Passes Protecting American Energy Production Act
- TotalEnergies Restarts Production in Denmark's Biggest Gas Field
- USA Oil and Gas Job Figures Jump
- Republican Lawmakers Say IEA Has Abandoned Energy Security Mission
- Blockchain Demands Attention in Oil and Gas
- Houthis Warn Saudi Arabia of Retaliation If It Backs USA Attacks
- Macquarie Sees USA Oil Production Exiting 2024 at 14MM Barrels Per Day
- Summer Pump Prices Set to Hit $4 a Gallon Just as Americans Hit the Road
- Chinese Mega Company Makes Major Oilfield Discovery
- VIDEO: Missile Attack Kills Crew Transiting Gulf of Aden
- Norway Regulator Blasts Proposal to Halt New Oil and Gas Permits
- Chinese Mega Company Makes Another Major Oilfield Discovery
- New China Climate Chief Says Fossil Fuels Must Keep a Role
- What Is the Biggest Risk to Offshore Oil and Gas Personnel in 2024?
- Vessel Sinks in Red Sea After Missile Strike
- Exxon Rights in Stabroek Do Not Apply to Hess Merger with Chevron: Hess
- Analysts Reveal Latest Oil Price Outlook Following OPEC+ Cut Extension
- Equinor Makes Discovery in North Sea