Transerv to Retest Warro-4 Well in WA's Warro Gas Field
Transerv Energy announced Tuesday that both Warro-5 and 6 wells in permit RL-7 in Western Australia's Warro gas field continue to flow naturally and that Warro-4 will be re-tested.
Transerv have prepared the attached review of the well results to date.
Warro-5 and 6
Warro-5 gas flow rate is presently averaging 0.5 million cubic feet per day (MMcf/d) with an accompanying water rate of 220 barrels of water per day (bwpd).
Warro-6 gas flow rate is presently averaging 0.59 MMcf/d with an accompanying water rate of 225 bwpd.
The attached note sets out the rationale for re-testing Warro-4. In summary, the results of Warro-5 and 6 have shown the original testing program was too short and valuable information can be obtained about the potential of the upper reservoir section by retesting the well.
- Warro 5 & 6 have established natural flow
- The water production can be managed
- Future wells and frac programs do not need to try and avoid fractures
- Warro 4 to be retested in upper zone from Warro-5 & 6
Production testing of Warro-5 and 6 has now been proceeding for over a month. During that time we have learnt much about the reservoir performance and the capability of the wells to produce gas.
Warro-5 and 6 penetrated the main reservoir section 525 feet (160 meters) downdip from previous wells and showed that the Warro Gas accumulation has a very substantial gas column height (over 1,444 feet or 440 meters) and the bottom of the accumulations is yet to be reached (i.e. it is below the total depth or TD of Warro-6 at 14,829 feet or 4,520 meters). The wells, Warro-3, 4, 5 and 6 have each evaluated diﬀerent parts of the gas column with varying degrees of success. It is the combined results of these wells and zones which now need to be synthesized to understand the ﬂow capacity of the ﬁeld. This work is ongoing.
Based on expert advice, the Joint Venture determined that a cautious approach to the fracture stimulation program at Warro-5 and 6 was the best approach. It was thought important to constrain the height and length of the fracs to lessen the likelihood of encountering any faults or fractures which, although not identiﬁed on the 3D seismic, could still be present. “Short and stubby” fracs were chosen in the hope they would remain precisely in zone and be of limited length. It was also recommended that only part of the reservoir be stimulated and to target the lower portion of the reservoir section present in both wells to avoid the potential for water ingress from above. Post frac logging showed all the fracs were placed according to plan and stayed within their target zones. This means that future frac work can target the entire pay zone with conﬁdence.
The lesson from this and the subsequent testing is that there is a pervasive small scale fracture network throughout the whole Warro gas accumulation and the wells will ﬂow water with the gas. The higher permeability natural fractures will act as a conduit for reservoir water and should also provide a good network through which gas can be produced. As the structure appears to be fractured naturally, the original interpretation that the source of water was deep-seated faulting is likely incorrect or at least only part of the explanation. This means that the fracture stimulation approach no longer needs to be constrained to structurally “quiet“ areas, at least as interpreted on seismic, thereby providing many more drilling locations and the potential to use larger scale fracture stimulation techniques throughout the entire section.
Both Warro-5 and 6 were designed so that any water encountered could be extracted using a jet pump. This proved to be necessary and the jet pumps were very successful. After the initial ﬂush of water, both wells have shown they are capable of natural ﬂow. While the gas rates are lower than expected, both wells are ﬂowing gas naturally, primarily from one zone, and early indications are that the water system is ﬁnite and water rates are likely to be manageable.
While the rates seen from the selected producing zones at Warro-5 and 6 are presently not high enough to be commercial in their own right, the wells have conﬁrmed that producible gas is present in the lower part of the pay section. The previous wells, Warro-3 and 4, supplement the results of Warro-5 and 6 and altogether provide a fuller understanding of the potential of the entire pay section. For example, Warro-3 ﬂowed approximately 2 MMcf/d with similar water rates for over a week before attempts to close oﬀ the water were carried out. While not strictly additive, each well has established ﬂow from a diﬀerent reservoir level. By recognizing this, and lifting the restraint imposed on the frac approach by the previous fault model, the Joint Venture has commenced a re-evaluation of the ﬁeld.
An important step in this re-evaluation has been the realisation that the testing of Warro-4 was stopped prematurely. Warro-4 employed expensive nitrogen lift to “dewater” the wells rather than a jet pump. With the recent success of the jet pumps, Warro-4 will now be re-entered and retested. Warro-4 was fracture stimulated in a part of the reservoir overlying the zones currently ﬂowing in Warro-5 and 6. Warro-4 used larger scale fracs and should give a valuable indication of the long-term ﬂow capacity of the upper sands. The well is conﬁgured so that this can be done very cost effectively and planning is underway to carry out the retesting program in the coming weeks pending Government approvals. Previously, Warro-4 ﬂowed each zone for two weeks at a combined rate of 0.6 MMcf/d with approximately 650 bwpd.
In conclusion, while the results from Warro-5 and 6 are still being gathered and analyzed, the wells continue to make an important contribution to the understanding of the ﬁeld and its true potential. The original testing program was designed to run for up to six months and will continue while new and valuable information is being generated.
The retesting of the Warro-4 upper pay section, combined with the results of Warro-5 and 6 lower pay sections, will provide the Joint Venture with good guidance on the potential of the entire reservoir section and potentially provide a means to exploit the huge gas resources trapped underground.
WHAT DO YOU THINK?
Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.