Denton Repeals Voter-Approved Fracking Ban

The Denton City Council reluctantly agreed in a 6-1 vote Tuesday night to repeal the ban on hydraulic fracturing approved by 59 percent of its electorate in November.

The ban, which was the subject of two lawsuits, was rendered ineffective by the Legislature push and the governor’s signature on House Bill 40. Lawmakers supporting the bill said it simply clarified that the state controls what happens below the ground while cities have authority over local traffic and safety.

City leaders were concerned that leaving the law on its local books risked a precedent-setting court decision that could impact other local control advocates.

During the public discussion of the issue, one resident said it’s with a heavy heart that she understands the repeal is the best option for the city. She added that when lawmakers passed House Bill 40, which pre-empted a city’s ability to prohibit fracking within its limits, they effectively “flushed democracy down the toilet.”

Most of the public testimony shared the sentiment that the ban should be repealed, but not forgotten.

Council member Greg Johnson said it was time for the city to “let go of the rope,” and remove the threat of court action.

“What we’re faced here is with one of two bad choices,” he said, to either repeal the ban or leave it’s enforceability to the courts. “If we repeal the ordinance, we do know for sure the lawsuits are mooted and we don’t have exposure of a court victory and paying their legal fees. I just don’t think [a lawsuit] is a risk we should take when the end result is we still don’t get to enforce our ban. It’s not a good choice, but I think it’s the best bad choice.”


Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

Ron  |  June 22, 2015
Yeah, its to bad that property rights now one ups squatters. I mean really, Im a farmer whose family settled this area 150 years ago, and you show up 15 years ago after buying into a subdivision behind my back 40. Then have the gall to tell me I cant exercise my property rights because you are concerned about your safety??? How about you move out, sell for whatever you can get and take the hit rather than penalizing me because you made a bad decision 15 years ago. Or better yet why not impose a tax on everyone in the city. That way you can be reimbursed for your loss by those causing it. All depends on whose ox is being gored now doesnt it?