Musings: It's Official - Oil Industry Enters The New Era Of Austerity

This opinion piece presents the opinions of the author.
It does not necessarily reflect the views of Rigzone.

Last week, Chevron (CVX-NYSE), the second largest oil company, held its annual analyst meeting at which time the company’s management laid out its plans for the next five years, including projections for capital spending and oil and gas production growth. The meeting followed on a presentation at the IHS CERA Week conference in Houston by Chevron CEO John Watson in which he proclaimed that today’s $100 a barrel oil is the equivalent of the past’s $20 a barrel oil. By that he meant that the oil industry must now figure its budget outlooks based on the need for oil prices to stay around the $100 a barrel level in order for the company to generate the necessary cash flow to support spending plans and for projects to offer future returns to meet or exceed required investment hurdles. Mr. Watson has talked about the impact on his business of rapidly escalating costs for finding and developing new oil reserves, which is why he says the company now needs that $100 a barrel price. Chevron is the latest major oil company to implicitly declare that the oil industry has entered a new era – one marked by higher costs and more disciplined capital investment programs that will require higher oil prices. Capital discipline forces companies to sacrifice production growth targets on the altar of increased profitability in order to boost returns to shareholders. What does this new era mean for the oil and gas business? Equally important, what does it mean for energy markets?

Chevron now projects it will produce 3.1 million barrels a day of oil equivalent (boe/d) in 2017, down from a target of 3.3 million boe/d that the company established in 2010 and reiterated to the analysts last year. If Chevron attains its target, it will have increased production in the interim by 19%, a not inconsequential gain. Mr. Watson attributed the reduction in the company’s output target to lower spending for shale wells due to the fall in North American natural gas prices, higher volumes of oil going to the host countries where the company operates under production-sharing arrangements, and “project slippage.” Mr. Watson also indicated that the company would raise $10 billion from the sale of assets, up from its previous target of $7 billion. The company plans to sell oil and gas fields and acreage to raise the funds.

Musings: It's Official - Oil Industry Enters The New Era Of Austerity


View Full Article


Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

eric  |  March 20, 2014
interesting observations corrections - XOM & CVX are #1 and #2 US headquartered e&ps - not global comments - the dynamic of unconventional shale assets being able to be proven up as contingent reserves on a massive scale, with high geologic probability of success, and for development programs to be easily ramped up and down on a year to year basis has made them attractive in comparison to high risk deepwater exploration and development on equivalent scale. These factors combined with their presence on private and state lands (away from obstructive federal administration influence) has contributed to their attractiveness. The prospective export of LNG from shale gas could increase its value with access to world markets. Additionally, the gas price collapse has led to a wholesale shift to liquids rich shale gas and shale oil prospects. HES and NXY are good examples of independents heavily invested in unconventionals that have had to shed conventional deepwater assets to protect fund capital programs at the expense of production. Regards, Eric

Most Popular Articles