America, The Energy Exporter

At a minimum, motorists in an energy self-sufficient North America will benefit from stable if not lower gasoline prices.  No longer would civil strife in the Middle East significantly affect family budgets in Middle America. On the other side of the globe, establishing the U.S. as an energy exporter strengthens economic partnerships with competitors in Asia such as China and India. 

Additionally, the nation’s inland waterway system is in dire need of upgrades and routine maintenance. The network of canals and waterways that crisscross America carry approximately 22 percent of domestic petroleum products and more than half of our agricultural commodities. The system has faced years of neglect and is in need of additional federal spending to upgrade dam, lock and levy systems.

Passage of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act will provide much needed funding and reform to Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund, the Inland Waterway Trust Fund, and other waterway related programs and agencies. This will further expand our ability to freely and affordably transport and export domestically produced energy.

One indicator of the nation’s ability to transform into a net energy exporter are distillate exports such as diesel or jet fuel.  The U.S. exported a record 3.8 million barrels a day in July 2013 to places as far away as Asia. One factor driving exports is low sulfur diesel produced in the U.S. but in demand in South and Central America because of new air quality laws.  

As America moves into its new role as an energy exporter, public policy should keep pace with America’s booming energy finds. Permitting improvements to pipelines, ports, railways and highways will both strengthen the U.S. economy at home and stabilize partnerships abroad.  

Jeff Huddleston is a managing director for Conway MacKenzie where he counsels energy companies on restructuring, strategic planning and merger & acquisition. 


12

View Full Article

WHAT DO YOU THINK?


Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

Ted  |  December 15, 2013
I consider crude oil to be a strategic commodity inexorably linked to our national security and as such, no export of crude should be allowed. One could argue that finished products are exportable under strict controls. Lest we forget how our reliance on, and purchase of middle east oil has financed and funded terrorism throughout the world. No money from rich middle east sheiks equals a huge reduction in terrorism over time. The proper use of our newly found oil would be to stabilize and reduce the price of gasoline and other products made from oil used in this country, giving the population an automatic "raise", taking the pressure off of demands for more hourly wages, and reducing the demand on the government for handouts. This should be seen as a national priority and a service to the country at the highest level. Those with the capabilities to make this happen should forsake their drive for additional profit and make a true philanthropic donation to their country and the security of all its citizens. There will be those who think this idea is too Pollyannish, but I believe there are still true patriots in this country that would love to be involved in a real energy project that addresses some of the real issues we face in this country. What do you think?
Jeffrey J. Brown  |  December 09, 2013
From the article, "There are two obstacles keeping the U.S. from being a net-exporter of crude oil." I suppose that I would add a third, to-wit, that the US is currently reliant on imports for about half of the crude oil that is processed daily in US refineries. I estimate that the US is going to average an annual crude oil (actually crude + condensate) production rate of about about 7.5 mbpd (million barrels per day) in 2013. In my opinion, the US is going to be lucky to maintain this approximate production rate out to the year 2023. Assuming a 10%/year annual production decline rate from existing wells (this would be the production decline from 2013 to 2014, if no new wells were completed in 2014), which is probably a conservative estimate, the US oil industry would have to replace 100% of current crude oil production--every field from the Gulf of Mexico to Alaska--over the next 10 years, just to maintain the current crude oil rate for 10 years. And Citi Research puts the overall decline rate from existing US natural gas production at about 24%/year, which implies that just to maintain current US natural gas production, the industry has to replace 100% of current US natural gas production in about four years. Meanwhile, we have seen a regional decline in Western Hemisphere net oil exports, from the seven major net oil exporters in the Americas, as their combined net oil exports fell from 5.9 mbpd in 2004 to 5.0 mbpd in 2012 (EIA, total petroleum liquids + other liquids). And we have seen a global post-2005 decline in Global Net Exports of oil, with the developing countries, led by China, consuming an increasing share of a post-2005 declining volume of Global Net Exports of oil.

Most Popular Articles