NATO Won't Up Presence In The Arctic
OSLO - The North Atlantic Treaty Organization has no plans to increase its presence in the Arctic, Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said Wednesday despite numerous countries' keen interest in the region's vast natural resources.
"NATO has no intention of increasing its presence and activities in the Far North," Fogh Rasmussen said in Oslo after spending two days visiting northern Norway.
The Arctic is believed to hold some 90 billion barrels of oil and 30% of the world's yet-to-be discovered natural gas resources.
Those riches have become increasingly accessible as the Arctic ice shrinks. Not only countries bordering the Arctic Ocean are keen to claim the resources but also other nations further afield, such as China, are looking on with interest.
Several states, including Russia, Canada and the United States, have already announced a reinforcement of their military presence to defend their claims.
Norway, which shares a border with Russia, has made the Far North its top priority and has in recent years tried to draw the attention of NATO and the European Union to the region.
"Norway has, like all other allies, a legitimate expectation that NATO's collective defense should cover all of NATO's territory, including of course the north of Norway," Fogh Rasmussen said at a joint press conference with Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg.
"The Arctic is a hard environment. It rewards cooperation, not confrontation. I trust we'll continue to see cooperation," the NATO chief wrote on Tuesday evening on Twitter.
The foreign ministers of the Arctic Council, an international forum for the eight states bordering the Arctic, are to meet on May 15 in Kiruna, in northern Sweden.
Among other things, they are to consider a request from several other nations and bodies--China, India, Italy, Japan, Singapore, South Korea, and the EU--to be granted observer status on the Council.
The U.K., France and Germany are among those who already hold observer status.
WHAT DO YOU THINK?
Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.
- US Could 'Steal' Green Energy Investments From Other Regions
- BofA Global Research Talks OPEC+ Meeting
- USA Oil and Gas Employs Almost 1 Million in 2022
- Eni Pens $8 Billion Gas Deal With Libya's NOC
- New Discoveries Make 2022 Highest Value Year In Over A Decade
- Germany Wants to Take Action to Curb Russian LNG Imports
- Exxon Beats Estimates, Posts Record $56B 2022 Profit
- RRC Issues Weather Notice to Oil and Gas Groups
- Chariot Buys ENEO Water
- Oceaneering Joins Kontiki Winds In Electrifying Offshore Assets
- Is The USA Strategic Petroleum Reserve Stock Dangerously Low?
- Top Headlines: Valaris Employee Reported Missing from Rig
- Police to Board Valaris Rig After Worker Reported Missing
- What Bad Habits Should Oil and Gas Jobseekers Avoid?
- Risk Premium Embedded in USA NatGas Vanishes
- Governor Issues Disaster Declaration for Southeast Texas
- Fundamentals Strong Enough for $90+ Oil Period
- Big Oil Saw Record $199Bn Profits In 2022 But 2023 Will Be Different
- North Sea Industry Body Releases First Ever Documentary
- Offshore Rigs Set For Very Busy Year In 2023
- Valaris Employee Reported Missing from Rig
- Louisiana, Texas To Gain Thousands of Energy Jobs At Start of 2023
- Where Will WTI Oil Price Be at End 2023?
- Is the USA Shale Boom Over?
- Gasoline and Diesel Prices Expected to Fall
- Higher Oil Prices Have Not Led to More Exploration
- Talos Makes Two Commercial Discoveries In Gulf Of Mexico
- Shell Finds Gas In Pensacola High-Impact Well Off UK
- Iran Oil Gushes Into Global Market
- Will Oil Hit $100 Per Barrel in 2023?