Pride, Ensco Enter MOU in Merger Lawsuit
Pride announced it and the other named defendants in the previously disclosed stockholder class action lawsuits filed in the Delaware Court of Chancery related to the proposed merger with Ensco entered into a memorandum of understanding with the plaintiffs to settle the litigation. As part of the memorandum of understanding and subject to the approval of the Ensco board of directors, Pride and Ensco agreed to, among other things, enter into an amendment to the merger agreement.
The amendment would reduce the fee payable by Pride in connection with certain terminations of the merger agreement to $195 million from $260 million. The amendment also would shorten the "tail period" for certain transactions that could trigger a termination fee from 12 months to nine months after termination. Under the amendment, the $195 million fee would be payable by Pride if the agreement is terminated under specified circumstances, including (1) the decision by the Pride board of directors to accept a superior proposal, (2) an adverse change in the recommendation of the Pride board of directors or (3) a failure to obtain approval by Pride stockholders after public disclosure of an alternative business combination proposal before the stockholder meeting and either the Pride board of directors determines such proposal to be a superior proposal or, within nine months after termination of the merger agreement, Pride enters into a definitive agreement or consummates an alternative business combination proposal.
The amendment also would eliminate the "force the vote" provision applicable to Pride such that Pride would not be required to submit the adoption of the merger agreement to its stockholders if the Pride board of directors made an adverse recommendation change.
Pursuant to the memorandum of understanding, Pride has also agreed to make certain additional disclosures related to the proposed merger in an SEC filing.
The memorandum of understanding also provides, among other things, that the parties will seek to enter into a stipulation of settlement which provides for the release of certain claims held by such class. The stipulation of the settlement will be subject to customary conditions, including court approval. There can be no assurance that the parties will ultimately enter into a stipulation of settlement that receives court approval. The memorandum of understanding is also subject to the approval of the Ensco board of directors.
- Baker Hughes Moving Closer To Fulfilling Net-Zero Target
- Prelude LNG Shipments Disrupted Until Mid-July Over Pay Spat
- Libya Halts Oil Exports from Key Port
- New UK Oil Tax Raises Risk of Energy Shortages
- USA Condemns Mortar Attacks on IKR Oil Infrastructure
- First-Ever 8th Gen Drilling Juggernaut Delivered To Transocean
- Top Headlines: USA Navy and Iran Corps Clash in Strait of Hormuz and More
- USA Energy Sec Leads Meeting with 7 Major Oil Companies
- Oil and Gas Lease Sales in Wyoming, Colorado, New Mexico Pushed Back
- G7 Weighs Russia Oil Price Cap
- Germany Fears Russia Could Permanently Close Main Gas Pipeline
- New Mexico Oil Refinery Cost Doubles
- $150 Oil Could Still Happen. Here's How.
- Russian Oil Isn't Dead Yet
- Sonatrach Makes Massive Gas Find In Sahara Desert
- Oil Prices Buck Recession Trend
- USA Navy and Iran Corps Clash in Strait of Hormuz
- Oil Industry Responds to Biden Letter
- Rapidly Decaying Supertanker Could Explode at Any Time
- Top Headlines: USA Navy and Iran Corps Clash in Strait of Hormuz and More
- Oil Nosedives on Fed Inflation Actions
- Top Headlines: Oil Industry Responds to Biden Letter and More
- Too Early To Speculate on ExxonMobil Refinery Fire Cause
- Fitch Solutions Reveals Latest Oil Price Forecast
- ExxonMobil Made More Money Than God This Year
- Russian Oil Disappears as Tankers Go Dark