Manufacturing Group Opposes LNG Export Applications



Manufacturing Group Opposes LNG Export Applications
A US trade group representing manufacturers with $1 trillion in annual sales wants DOE to reject four applications to export LNG from the Gulf Coast.

A U.S. trade group representing manufacturers with $1 trillion in annual sales has gone on record against four liquefied natural gas (LNG) export applications submitted to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE).

“LNG export volumes decrease pipeline capacity that is available to U.S. consumers, because the natural gas is committed to going offshore to supply other countries, not U.S. consumers,” the Industrial Energy Consumers of American (IECA) argued in a written statement emailed Friday to Rigzone.

Washington, D.C.-based IECA reported that it has submitted comments to DOE opposing four LNG export applications. The organization claims that DOE, which authorizes LNG exports, and the LNG project developers have failed to determine whether enough gas pipeline capacity exists to serve domestic consumers as well as LNG exports. Firms submitting LNG export applications, and links to each application’s DOE docket index and IECA’s respective notices to DOE, are as follows:

IECA noted the applications increase approved LNG export volume by 3.5 Bcf per day. The Cheniere Marketing/Corpus Christi project is on the Texas Gulf Coast. The remaining projects are in southwestern Louisiana.

“By the end of 2019, LNG exports will have reduced available pipeline capacity nearly 10 Bcf per day,” stated IECA, adding the above applications raise LNG export volumes by 3.5 Bcf per day. “At the same time, placed in service interstate natural gas pipelines have slowed. New pipeline capacity faces growing headwinds.”

IECA added that DOE has already approved LNG exports representing approximately 31.2 Bcf per day of cumulative volume. The organization stated that equates to approximately 38 percent of 2018 demand to countries with which the U.S. does not have a free-trade agreement (FTA) or 68 percent to countries that have signed FTAs with the U.S.

When reviewing LNG export applications, DOE decides whether a submission aligns with the public interest, according to the Center for LNG (CLNG) website. FTA countries automatically gain the public interest designation while non-FTA countries require further review, CLNG points out.

“The DOE-approved LNG export applications are legal commitments to export for 20 to 30 years, substantially increasing risks to the U.S. consumer,” IECA stated.

IECA noted that its membership include manufacturers at more than 3,700 U.S. facilities in the chemicals, plastics, steel, iron ore, aluminum, paper, food processing, fertilizer, insulation, glass, industrial gases, pharmaceutical, building products, automotive, brewing, independent oil refining and cement industries.

To contact the author, email mveazey@rigzone.com.



WHAT DO YOU THINK?


Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

Rudolf Huber  |  December 28, 2019
I understand them - they want to be sure the Natural Gas price stays as low as possible so their energy costs are low and they are more competitive as a result. I am pretty sure that if Trump lifted all taxes on domestic sales of domestically produced Natural Gas the economy as a whole would benefit.