Lawmakers Seek Clarification on Planned USA Pipes Safety Rule
Republican legislators on Tuesday asked the USA pipeline safety agency to detail any cost-benefit analysis on a proposed regulation that would require operators to toughen leak and hazard prevention measures.
The Department of Transportation’s (DOT) Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) said Friday it has filed a draft rule to strengthen industry measures to curb methane emissions and prevent safety risks to people and the environment from gas pipelines.
The proposal mandates operators hold more leakage surveys and deploy commercially available advanced leak detection tech “to meet a minimum performance standard”. It also revises down the minimum reporting threshold to detect smaller leaks, seeks to prevent equipment failures, specifies criteria and timeframes for leak repairs and encourages owners to invest in methane-capture equipment.
Cathy McMorris Rodgers, chair of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, and Jeff Duncan, chair of the Subcommittee on Energy, Climate and Grid Security, responded with a letter to the PHMSA Tuesday demanding answers about what factors the agency considered in crafting the new rule, including whether any price impact on consumers had been accounted for.
“By law, PHMSA is required to conduct a risk assessment and cost-benefit analysis, so all new regulations are costeffective”, the GOP lawmakers said.
The letter addressed to PHMSA acting administrator Tristan Brown proceeded to ask: “Has PHMSA estimated the compliance costs of the proposed regulation?
“How much does PHMSA expect the proposed regulation will increase the price of natural gas for American consumers?
“How does PHMSA estimate environmental costs and benefits? Does PHMSA estimate environmental costs and benefits related to climate change that are incurred outside the United States for use in agency rulemakings?
“Does PHMSA utilize the Social Cost of Carbon, the Social Cost of Methane, or other tools or models to estimate environmental costs related to climate change?
“How does PHMSA define ‘equity benefits’, a term used in the May 5, 2023 proposal?”
The PHMSA said in the press statement Friday announcing the submission of the proposal to the Federal Register the measures it has put forward in the new regulation “would boost efficiency, cut harmful pollution and waste, and create an estimated up to $2.3 billion annually in benefits”.
The Republicans also said in the letter they are holding a review of the enforcement of pipeline safety laws.
“As the Committee considers reauthorizing the nation’s pipeline safety laws, we are committed to ensuring that PHMSA and States that have assumed primary safety authority have the necessary resources to ensure the safe and efficient transportation of natural gas, liquid fuels, and feedstocks for manufacturing and agriculture”, the letter stated.
It added: “There are numerous overdue congressional mandates and open rulemakings that have not been finalized by PHMSA”.
To contact the author, email firstname.lastname@example.org
What do you think? We’d love to hear from you, join the conversation on the
Rigzone Energy Network.
The Rigzone Energy Network is a new social experience created for you and all energy professionals to Speak Up about our industry, share knowledge, connect with peers and industry insiders and engage in a professional community that will empower your career in energy.
- Two Main Forces Have Come Together to Pull Down Commodity Prices
- UK Offshore Energy Calls for Labour Party Meet
- Aker BP's 1.07 Bboe North Sea Projects Get Parliament Nod
- Coal Getting Cheaper in China Despite Heat-Induced Demand Surge
- Mitsubishi Shipbuilding Eyes to Fuel Sea Transport with Ammonia
- Distillate Crack Spreads Return to February 2022 Levels: EIA
- Americas Exploration Heats Up
- Gas South Inks Plumbing Deal for Its Consumers
- Saudi Oil Cut Risks Leaving Bitter Taste for Budget
- Irving Oil Starts Review That Puts Key Refinery on Market
- Saudis Remind Global Oil Market Who is King
- Saudi to Cut Output by 1MM BPD in Solo OPEC+ Move
- Data Science is the Future of Oil and Gas
- Debt Ceiling Deal Becomes Law
- What Do Latest OPEC+ Moves Mean?
- TotalEnergies Inks Agua Marinha PSC in Brazil
- Fatality At North Rankin Complex
- North America Loses More Rigs
- Par Pacific Completes Buy of ExxonMobil Refinery
- Regulator Fines Hilcorp Alaska in Latest of Over 60 Enforcement Actions
- Which Generation Is Most in Demand in Oil, Gas Right Now?
- Who Is the Most Prolific Private Oil and Gas Producer in the USA?
- USA EIA Slashes 2023 and 2024 Brent Oil Price Forecasts
- BMI Reveals Latest Brent Oil Price Forecasts
- Is There a Danger That Oil and Gas Runs out of Financing?
- BMI Projects Gasoline Price Through to 2026
- What Will World Oil Demand Be in 2023?
- North America Rig Count Reduction Rumbles On
- What New Oil and Gas Jobs Will Exist in the Future?
- What Does a 2023 USA Recession Mean for Oil and Gas in the Country?