Could the LNG Boom go Bust?

Could the LNG Boom go Bust?
Not surprisingly, energy traders and analysts are now thinking the unthinkable - could the current boom in LNG go bust?

For the past decade, LNG traders have sold the idea that investing in billion dollar export projects was a good way to make fast profits. The growth in import markets to 37, with the addition of Bangladesh and Panama in 2018 and Asian demand, especially from China and South Korea, made LNG liquefaction export plants a great bet. In 2018, world trade in LNG reached a record 316 million tonnes (MT), an increase of 28.2 MT on the previous year. In February 2019, a further 101 MT was under construction or sanctioned. Not surprisingly, energy traders and analysts are now thinking the unthinkable; could the current boom in LNG go bust?

Market surplus

The world seems awash with LNG. Supply has been boosted by the emergence of U.S. and Russian LNG exports. Thanks to burgeoning U.S. shale gas production on the American mainland, five export plants have opened since 2016 (including Cove Point, which can handle Q-Max ships with a loading capacity of 266,000 cubic metres) and made the U.S. a serious player. Russia’s Yamal and Sakhalin plants opened in 2018 and 2017, respectively. Completion of new projects, new trains coming onstream and higher utilization of existing facilities have raised output in Australia, Cameroon and Qatar. The result is seen in lower prices and fears of an overhang of supply lasting to at least 2022. Rudolf Huber, President of LNG Europe, an advocacy organization, attributes the oversupply situation to “misinterpreted market signals over the last ten years. And it goes back until before the shale revolution, when the entire world thought the U.S. would be the biggest LNG importer in time.”

Indeed, the Fukushima crisis of 2011 masked the potential oversupply problem, because it forced Japan to switch all its nuclear reactors off, creating a sharp and sustained increase in demand for LNG imports to feed gas power generation plants. This eliminated the LNG surplus and absorbed the output of new Australian plants coming online between 2012 and 2015. However, since 2015, Japan’s demand for LNG has subsided as nuclear power plants were switched back on.

New supplies after 2015 were absorbed by not only Europe and South Korea but also China, where air pollution and smog blanketing major cities aroused a public outcry and created a large and growing market for LNG from Australia and Qatar. China rapidly rose to become the world’s largest importer of LNG, which has increased by a compound annual rate of 31 percent in the last two years, according to official Chinese sources. But can this continue?

Chinese Demand shortfall

“Now its game over. How many one-offs do we still have as China’s demand is lagging?” asks Huber. China’s economy is slowing, partly owing to the U.S. trade war and partly thanks to internal factors. The switchover to gas power generation, district heating and away from coal is proving harder than expected. This, together with substantial expansion in China’s renewable energy supplies, could slow the growth in higher-priced LNG imports. But, more significantly perhaps, the new Russian Power of Siberia pipeline is due to begin delivering 5 bcm of gas to Northern Chinese cities at the start of 2020 and will supply 38 bcm of natural gas a year from 2025, which potentially could encroach on LNG imports. Consequently, Huber argues that “China's gas demand will not grow as fast as many predicted and the new pipeline will impact LNG exporter's opportunities”.


In the longer term, in response to widespread and increasing climate anxiety, the pace of decarbonization could accelerate faster than previously envisaged, not only at the expense of oil but also natural gas and LNG.


Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

Rudolf Huber  |  November 29, 2019
LNG has never been a business for fast profits. It's a longterm industry that needs committed leaders to build markets. The current flock of LNG developers looks like Casino gamblers in comparison. They expect some things out of their control to come and throw money at their forlorn projects. Participants in Ponzi schemes are similar in mental outlook. They have a choice now. They can buckle up and support market development and the biggest market for grabs is the fuel market. Or they can just sit tight and wait until they shrivel up and die. The choice is theirs.