$200B in the LNG Project Pipeline

$200B in the LNG Project Pipeline
Wood Mackenzie declares the "boom is back" for LNG.

Declaring that the “boom is back” for liquefied natural gas (LNG), Wood Mackenzie predicts that capital spending on LNG plant and upstream infrastructure will total more than $200 billion from 2019 to 2025.

In fact, a new Wood Mackenzie study anticipates that nearly 90 million tonnes per annum (mmtpa) of LNG capacity should take final investment decision (FID) and start construction in the next two years alone. Engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) contractors and others along the LNG supply chain should get a “major boost” as a result, the consultancy finds.

To be sure, Wood Mackenzie points out that the LNG industry is “notorious” when it comes to cost overruns and project delays. The firm points out that only 10 percent of all LNG projects have been constructed under budget and 60 percent have encountered delays.

“The many projects jostling for FID right now have low headline costs, but in light of the historical reality of LNG construction, some project delays are likely,” Liam Kelleher, senior global LNG research analyst with Wood Mackenzie, said in a written statement emailed to Rigzone. “While there is a risk that current low LNG prices may see some proposed projects cancelled, Wood Mackenzie believes the risk to new LNG supply development is low and we see considerable upside supply potential.”

Kelleher also noted that, in Wood Mackenzie’s high case, the firm projects that an additional 70 mmtpa of capacity could be sanctioned in the next three years.

“Should even some of that materialize, construction would be stretched beyond the height of the 2010-14 boom,” said Kelleher, adding that the upcoming construction cycle will not necessarily be a replay of the last.

According to Kelleher, a number of factors have changed.

“Firstly, the global spread of projects will mean that the local inflation pressure, particularly in terms of manpower, which hit Australia and the U.S. in previous cycles is lessened,” Kelleher said. “Secondly, developers are also being more cautious about LNG development solutions, opting for modularization and capex phasing. This, coupled with renewed caution with investment programs across the upstream sector, should help limit global upstream inflation.”

Furthermore, Kelleher pointed out that cheaper raw materials costs – notably subsiding global steel prices – and the entrance of new EPC players translate into strong competition for construction contracts.

“While LNG operators have enjoyed a return to profits in recent years, many LNG EPC contractors remain firmly in the red,” said Kelleher. “Tough times bring tough contract conditions and EPC contractors have taken financial hits from project cost overruns as seen at Ichthys, Cameron and Freeport. With an increase in workload, there is the potential for a recovery in project revenues for EPC contractors.”


Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

Rudolf Huber  |  April 26, 2019
I hear that, and I like lots of new LNG projects potentially coming online over the next decade. More LNG means more product and more pressure to develop new markets which will make LNG as a fuel and even more enticing proposition. Alone - I am still not sold on this number. The obstacles are still formidable and one project is not like the other. There are still some real dinosaurs out there but there is also some nimble folks. In the end, modularization and the return of sanity to EPC will go a long way. Maybe not as far as 200 billion - but why would that matter? If the European heavy transport market alone decided to adopt LNG as the fuel of choice because they want to clear our skies and still remain competitive beyond the homeopathic measures we have now, it might mop up the LNG 200 billion worth of projects provide with ease.

Most Popular Articles