It is important to get it right, Raymond said. "The intent is to come to a successful conclusion, but we have to recognize that it would likely be the largest single project anywhere in the world." He noted that discussions over a proposed natural gas pipeline to the Lower 48 have been going on for 30 years, and "fortunately we didn't do it earlier because it would have been an economic disaster for both the companies and the state."
Raymond was one of a panel of five major oil company chiefs answering to a joint hearing of the Senate Energy and Commerce committees on oil company profits. Ross Pillari, president and CEO of BP America, said he believed "the [Alaska] project will get done shortly." Of the three majors with a stake in Prudhoe Bay, ConocoPhillips is the only one that has come to a preliminary agreement in principle with the state.
Raymond's comments came in response to questions from Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) who noted ExxonMobil's $15 billion commitment to a gas liquefaction project in Qatar, saying she wanted to make sure Alaska gas was not bypassed. She also questioned whether there would be opportunities for other producers to gain access to the pipeline through a later expansion.
The "issue of access to an expansion of the line really isn't the key question right now," Raymond responded. "The key question is to build the line to begin with. The facts are that even if we come to an agreement with the state on construction of the line, it will be 10 years from now before that gas flows." While Alaska gas can make a significant contribution years down the road, "the more important question is in the near to medium term when we have to start dealing with access to natural gas through LNG terminals; the facts are we need to do it all."
Natural gas was mentioned only fleetingly in the three-hour barrage of rhetoric from more than 30 senators in what the National Association of Manufacturers correctly described as a "theatrical exercise devoid of constructive steps toward easing high prices and supply shortages." The appearance of the chiefs of the five major integrated oil companies in response to a threat of a windfall profits tax, was unprecedented. Besides Raymond and Pillari, the other witnesses were David O'Reilly, chairman and CEO of Chevron Corp., James Mulva, chairman and CEO of ConocoPhillips, John Hofmeister, president and U.S. country chair of Shell Oil Co.
Sen Lamar Alexander (R-TN) queried the panel as to what steps could be taken to ensure that natural gas-fired power generation plants be sequenced according to their level of efficiency. The producer chiefs said that was a question that could better be addressed to gas distributors.
The senators generally railed against the high prices of oil, gasoline and diesel fuel, citing its impact on the poor and middle classes, while criticizing the profits and executive salaries and bonuses being made by the oil companies and the executives.
The oil company leaders noted the industry's profit averaged 8% of revenues, which is in line with other industries, but because the companies are so large, the profits appeared to be large. It was noted that Microsoft has a better profit margin.
The industry witnesses noted the increased worldwide demand for petroleum, particularly from China, and stressed potential actions, such as opening up access to drilling -- which they said was a problem all over the world -- streamlining permitting among various governmental agencies, and standardizing, for instance gasoline specs. All of that would help to increase supplies and lower prices.
Copyright 2005 Intelligence Press Inc. All rights reserved. The preceding news report may not be republished or redistributed, in whole or in part, in any form, without prior written consent of Intelligence Press, Inc.
Most Popular Articles