Keystone Foes Duck Climate in Red State Oil Pipeline Battle

Keystone Foes Duck Climate in Red State Oil Pipeline Battle
You won't hear climate coming from Keystone XL foes as they argue against TransCanada's push to get the final state approval needed to build the pipeline.

(Bloomberg) -- You won’t hear the C-word coming from Keystone XL foes as they argue against TransCanada Corp.’s push to get the final state approval needed to build the pipeline.

C, as in climate.

Instead, even as the company seeks to limit objections, they’re spotlighting TransCanada’s use of eminent domain, which Republicans traditionally oppose in support of landowner rights. Supporters, meanwhile, are pressing another issue close to Republican hearts: Jobs.

As Keystone XL faces its final hurdle in Nebraska, the starkly different political landscape under President Donald Trump versus Barack Obama is bringing new shape to a debate that will be overseen by the state’s Republican-dominated Public Service Commission, set to hear a week of arguments starting Monday. With Trump in the White House, a positive nod from Nebraska could remove the final regulatory barrier.

Property rights "might be the thing that stops this," said Art Tanderup, who owns farmland on the pipeline’s route that’s been in his wife’s family for 100 years. Even some pipeline supporters say the company shouldn’t be able to "take their land away," he said.

Still, the jobs issue carries weight among Republicans as well, particularly in the age of Trump, who has focused on the energy industry’s ability to spark the U.S. economy. While the 2016 Republican platform says the Supreme Court’s 2005 ruling in support of eminent domain undermines the Constitution’s Fifth Amendment, Trump has in the past praised the decision.

Red State

Designed to carry 830,000 barrels of oil a day from Canada, the $8 billion Keystone XL pipeline will span 1,179 miles (1,897 kilometers), running through Montana, South Dakota and Nebraska. From there, the oil can flow south on existing lines to the Gulf Coast, which is an export hub and where refineries are built to process heavy crude.

Nebraska is a decisively red state: It hasn’t voted for a Democratic president since 1964 and four of the last five governors have been Republican. Still, the state has been an impediment to progress on the project, with lawmakers and landowners challenging the route with legislation and lawsuits. The company eventually agreed to a commission review instead of waging further court battles, setting up this month’s hearing.

Now, final approval will be decided by a commission board made up of four Republicans and a single Democrat.

"Before, knowing Obama’s philosophy, we hoped it would be stopped" at the federal level, Tanderup said in a telephone interview. "But no longer can I write a letter to the president of the United States, because it will do absolutely nothing. No longer is there that hope."

Presidential Permit

In 2015, the Obama administration denied the presidential permit necessary for cross-border pipelines after a State Department review found Keystone didn’t serve the national interest. But Trump, who came into office vowing to support the oil industry, quickly revived it.

Among proponents, the economic argument for jobs hasn’t changed from the very start of the debate. TransCanada, the president and labor unions have long touted the project is a job creator that will help the state’s economy. The state will benefit from 4,400-4,500 jobs during the two-year construction period, and $12 million in property tax revenues, according to the Calgary-based company.

"We were very excited about it. It was an opportunity to get our people back to work," said Ron Kaminski, a member of the Laborers’ International Union of North America. Kaminski, after running the local union in the state for about 10 years, shifted his focus to outreach.

In his view, this fight has revolved around the same facts and arguments for nine years: "There’s nothing new."


12

View Full Article

Copyright 2017 Bloomberg News.

WHAT DO YOU THINK?

Click on the button below to add a comment.
Post a Comment
Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.
John MorN | Aug. 10, 2017
Where are these taking land comments coming from? The landowners are handsomely rewarded for the use of very little of their land and has has been pointed out the pipeline is not even visible except for the occasional pump station for which the landowner is even more handsomely rewarded!

CW Minshew | Aug. 7, 2017
It is good that the issue is eminent domain, & not some crazy green-enviro argument. Taking anyones land should not be trivial; that owner has property rights. At the same time, the pipeline will benefit the Nation--IF it is economic to build. Refining this crude in US refineries on the coast will provide additional products to be sold--& reduce the supply of Venezuelan heavies used in the refining slate. The pipeline WILL be held to CFR 195 & other pipeline standards, & will be safe. The land required is approximately 50 wide for the length of the pipeline; & the pipeline WILL BE buried! Once built, except for pump stations or above-ground valves, one will hardly notice this line. The value is in the commercial terms; let the market decide.

Marcia | Aug. 4, 2017
Im thrilled to hear even mention of the eminent domain issue. I am very much against foreign country pipeline owners forcibly taking land from American land owners for questionable gain. And Keystone XL is indeed questionable, in spite of the excessively elevated claim of jobs brought to Americans. Thats been a bold lie from day one. The tar sands have little to contribute to oil production compared to West Texas sweet. And the carcinogen benzene would, if spilled in any amount, result in horrible human and animal deaths, and spoiled farmland and aquifers for many generations. Would you approve Russia owning a pipeline full of benzene taking away land through your backyard? Why should Canada get away with it? Or anyone for that matter. Next it would be Cuba running a pipeline of benzene through the Florida Keys. When does this madness stop?


Events  SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Our Privacy Pledge
SUBSCRIBE



Most Popular Articles

From the Career Center
Jobs that may interest you
Environmental Engineer
Expertise: Environmental Engineer
Location: Houston, 
 
Senior Quality Advisor
Expertise: CAD / CAM|HR - General|HSE Manager / Advisor|IT - SAP / ERP|PR / Corporate Communications|QA / QC / Inspection|Risk Management
Location: Perth, WA
 
Pipeline Engineer (Expression of Interest)
Expertise: Budget / Cost Control|CAD / CAM|Client Representative|HR - General|IT - Programming & Database|Pipeline Engineering|PR / Corporate Communications|Project Management
Location: Houston, TX
 
search for more jobs

Brent Crude Oil : $50.8/BBL 0.13%
Light Crude Oil : $47.55/BBL 0.08%
Natural Gas : $2.94/MMBtu 0.67%
Updated in last 24 hours