GOP's Tax Reform Plan Brings Uncertainty to Oil, Gas

GOP's Tax Reform Plan Brings Uncertainty to Oil, Gas
US corporate tax reform plan for a tariff on imports, but not exports, could boost income for domestic producers, but it might also pump up gasoline prices and raise refiners' costs.

House Republicans have a plan – and President Donald Trump has made a promise – to reform corporate tax in the United States. Economists say it could be a game-changer for oil and gas.

Touted as tax reform worthy of the late President Ronald Reagan, the package of talking points, “A Better Way: Our Vision For A Confident America,” is making its way through the halls of Congress now that the new administration is installed. 

Among the key elements of the proposal is a controversial border adjustment tax (BAT), which would cut the tariff on exports and levy a 20 percent fee on imports, and chop corporate taxes from 35 percent to 20 percent.

The U.S. corporate tax is currently the highest in the developed world, a function of decades’ worth of global trade policy.

“This tax burden is driving businesses out of our country,” said Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wisconsin, when he unveiled the plan. “In 1960, 17 of the 20 largest global companies were headquartered in the United States. As of 2016, that number has dropped to just 6. Our plan lowers the corporate tax rate to a more globally competitive level.”

Ryan and others say any pass-through costs to the consumer would be balanced by an increase in the value of the U.S. dollar. Not only would the currency align, so would the price of WTI as it surges $10 per barrel past Brent, they argue.

The philosophy of taxing what comes into the country, but not what goes out, fits into the “America First” rhetoric that factored into Trump’s ascendancy. And for his part, the Trump Administration has floated the idea of selectively taxing imports – and in the case of Mexico, to force the country to pay for Trump’s border wall. 

But that approach poses challenges, said Ed Hirs, managing director at Hillhouse Resources and an energy economics professor at the University of Houston.

“Take a look around you, your cell phone, the telephone you’re speaking on, the computer monitor, essentially the cost of those items for the importers is going to go up, which means of course it’ll be passed along to you, the consumer,” Hirs said. “They’ve got a naïve, simpleton assumption that the value of the dollar will increase enough to offset the losses to consumers. But that assumes that our trading partners and the Federal Reserve go along with this scheme.”

Indeed, Hirs and other economists suggest the move could easily lead to a trade war – and inflation.

“The simpleton plan that’s been proposed really has not thought through the downstream impacts,” Hirs said. “They’ve got their order of conditions of what will happen, but they really haven’t stopped to think that this is going to cause a very significant dislocation that just with the ordinary frictions in the economy will not be a trivial realignment.”

Still, the idea of reducing the corporate tax rate is one it seems everyone in the United States – on both sides – could get behind.


View Full Article

An award-winning journalist, Deon has reported on energy, business and politics for almost 20 years.


Click on the button below to add a comment.
Post a Comment
Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.
Chris Hansen | Feb. 20, 2017
OK. So the reason corporate taxes have climbed and trade goods coming were forgiven the currency and other advantages was because we did not apply Simpleton economics. Now we have a Simpleton in the White House and we are applying some courage to the trade policies. Is it not fair to question the reasoning, that the difference is that of financial intelligence & good will vs stupidity & courage or hubris as the Democrats & Dion would have us believe. Is it not more likely that other factors play a roll, the primary being that elections cost to much and politicians find themselves beholden to interests that are not compatible with American interests. We saw the power that accumulated in the hands of the Clintons by their 40 years in American politics when both the both investigative and judiciary departments with clear evidence before them could not shut down those insider operations. Ill take stupid over deliberately crooked every time, the results could not be worse. The globalization pursued by our politicians in the name of good will might be OK sometimes but not while it means weakening the only system that has bought us security and freedom. Americanize the global order, then go for it. The globalization of Europe is now advanced the their cultures are that much destroyed.


Our Privacy Pledge

More from this Author
Deon Daugherty
Senior Editor | Rigzone
 -  The Rigzone Interview: Private Equity ... (Jul 13)
 -  Could Argentinian Politics Beat the Va... (Jul 10)
 -  The Rigzone Interview: Oil, Gas Goes D... (Jul 6)
 -  Deal Of The Month: EQT, Rice Energy Me... (Jun 30)
 -  OpEd: OPEC Production Cuts Fail, Marke... (Jun 27)

Most Popular Articles

From the Career Center
Jobs that may interest you
Contracts Administrator
Expertise: Contracts Administration
Location: Anacortes, WA
Expertise: Engineering Manager
Location: Houston, TX
Sr. Project Manager
Expertise: Project Engineer|Project Management
Location: Odessa, 
search for more jobs

Brent Crude Oil : $50.97/BBL 1.53%
Light Crude Oil : $48.75/BBL 1.79%
Natural Gas : $2.92/MMBtu 0.68%
Updated in last 24 hours