Oil Industry Workers Split Between Trump And Clinton

Oil Industry Workers Split Between Trump And Clinton
US oil and gas industry workers have contributed only slightly more money to the campaign of Clinton than to Trump since the two clinched their parties' nominations for the White House.

Reuters

NEW YORK, Oct 24 (Reuters) - U.S. oil and gas industry workers have contributed only slightly more money to the campaign of Democrat Hillary Clinton than to Republican Donald Trump since the two clinched their parties' nominations for the White House, according to Reuters' review of federal disclosures.

The nearly even support suggests ambivalence in the industry between two rivals who have put forward wildly different energy visions. Trump calls for a drastic reduction in regulations to bolster drilling, while Clinton advocates tougher environmental protections and more renewables.

Employees in the industry gave Clinton $114,141 and Trump $99,302 since July 1, Reuters found in reviewing individual campaign contributions exceeding $200 and donations funneled through their joint fundraising committees. Both were officially nominated by their parties in mid-July.

Several oil and gas industry employees reached by Reuters said they did not donate just because of the candidates' energy policies. Most requested anonymity, citing the sensitivity of the election.

"I am moved by the disturbing nature of what I see in Trump's vision for America on trade, the economy and national security," said American Gas Association head Dave McCurdy, who has contributed to Clinton's campaign.

He added, however, that he agreed with Clinton on reducing carbon dioxide emissions blamed for climate change and felt natural gas would play a role in that effort.

The association has not endorsed a candidate.

Continental Resources Inc Chief Executive Officer Harold Hamm, who has contributed repeatedly to Trump's campaign, has argued in favor of the candidate's energy policies. Hamm has said bolstering U.S. drilling would reduce dependence on Middle East oil, whose proceeds he says finance terrorist attacks.

A Continental official did not respond to a request for comment from Hamm.

An energy lobbyist based in Washington said he understood the industry's ambivalence. "Clinton is pro-regulation, which hurts," he said, requesting anonymity. "And Trump has no record in the industry, so there's no evidence he understands the issues."

Clinton had far exceeded Trump in campaign contributions from industry employees during the primaries, but donations to the Republican side of the ledger were split among a much larger number of candidates than on the Democratic side.

During the Republican primaries, the industry had taken an early liking to former Florida Governor Jeb Bush, giving him more than all his rivals combined, before he dropped out of the race in February.

(Additional reporting and writing by Richard Valdmanis; Editing by Lisa Von Ahn)

Copyright 2016 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions.

WHAT DO YOU THINK?

Click on the button below to add a comment.
Post a Comment
Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.
Lohr64 | Oct. 29, 2016
I have to have serious doubts about this article too. Who, working in this industry would seriously vote for a continuation of the actual administration? If you still have a job in the O&G, you have seen how many jobs were destroyed since 2014 and you want to keep yours so you will vote Trump, if you have lost your job since 2014, you will vote for Trump, hopping to get back to work.

Paul S | Oct. 28, 2016
Why doesnt either candidate say something about the need to upgrade U.S. refineries so they can refine American crude oil into gas for our consumption? There are 147 oil refineries here, and we still depend on foreign oil to get processed into fuel for our cars. This does not make sense. We ship some of our crude oil overseas to other refineries. Maybe the government could offer tax credits to refiners who modify their plants to treat our crude. I really think we should do something to make ourselves energy independent.

Dennis Hutcheson | Oct. 28, 2016
I dont believe this article.


Events  SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Our Privacy Pledge
SUBSCRIBE



Most Popular Articles

From the Career Center
Jobs that may interest you
GIS Intern Job
Expertise: Cartography / Mapping|Landman|Modeling
Location: Eau Claire, WI
 
Mechanical Quality Assurance (QA) Specialist
Expertise: QA / QC / Inspection|Regulatory Compliance
Location: Anchorage, AK
 
Electrical Quality Assurance (QA) Specialist
Expertise: QA / QC / Inspection|Regulatory Compliance
Location: Anchorage, AK
 
search for more jobs

Brent Crude Oil : $53.89/BBL 1.67%
Light Crude Oil : $50.84/BBL 2.14%
Natural Gas : $3.7/MMBtu 2.77%
Updated in last 24 hours