Goldman Sachs: Big Oil Was Never That Big A Money-Maker

Goldman Sachs: Big Oil Was Never That Big A Money-Maker
Oil companies longing for the glory days of ultra-high crude prices might wish to think again.

(Bloomberg) -- Oil companies longing for the glory days of ultra-high crude prices might wish to think again.The rising oil prices that came to characterize energy markets in the mid-2000s, and which culminated in a record near-$150 a barrel in 2008, were not the windfall investors might have imagined, according to a new note from Goldman Sachs Group Inc. Instead, returns for major oil companies such as BP Plc, Royal Dutch Shell Plc, and Exxon Mobil Corp., actually declined between 2005 and 2014 as measured by cash return on capital invested.

The measure means that while the big three oil majors saw their total profits rise alongside higher oil prices, the amount of cash generated by their investments was declining, indicating higher costs of business. Returns per euro or dollar invested by capital-intensive Big Oil were hit with a triple whammy of higher taxes, more expensive service costs, and increased finding and development (F&D) expenses, Goldman analysts led by Henry Tarr argue. 

Still, return on capital is even lower now thanks to crude prices currently languishing at around $43 per barrel hovering at a 50-year low for the three super majors, according to Goldman's figures. Technological changes culminating in the explosion of shale drilling in the U.S. as well as the fight for market share launched by members of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), have combined to flatten the cost curve, meaning that there's less differentiation between 'break-even prices' for different oil producers."We believe the majors will find ways to compete with shale through driving costs lower on conventional projects, flattening the cost curve further," the analysts said in their note published late last week. "With a relatively flat cost curve, the outlook for returns remains muted, since most participants should just earn their cost of capital, with limited opportunity to do better than this by having projects lower on the cost curve."

Still, those returns look further threatened with oil prices at less than $50 a barrel, Goldman added."If the oil market rebalancing is delayed, then further U.S. shale efficiency improvements and low cost production in OPEC could keep oil prices lower than we anticipate," they concluded. "At a $50 per barrel flat oil price, sector multiples would be elevated vs. history and we believe all the European majors would cut dividends."

To contact the author of this story: Tracy Alloway in Abu Dhabi at To contact the editor responsible for this story: Lorcan Roche Kelly at

Copyright 2017 Bloomberg News.


Click on the button below to add a comment.
Post a Comment
Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.
Albert Stahr | Sep. 19, 2016
This is a half statement that intends to convey the message it wants to convey. What they dont say about as measured by cash return on capital invested. is that as money pours in taxation increases therefore huge capital is invested in exploration and infrastructure to keep taxes down ergo less taxable income. The inverse is happening now. Whats new? If youre going to tell a story, tell the whole story.

Related Companies

Our Privacy Pledge

Most Popular Articles

From the Career Center
Jobs that may interest you
Automation Engineering Manager
Expertise: Electrical Engineering|Engineering Manager
Location: Houston, TX
Senior Accountant
Expertise: Accounting
Location: Chantilly
Channel Development Manager Job
Expertise: Business Development|Sales
Location: Minneapolis, MN
search for more jobs

Brent Crude Oil : $56.86/BBL 0.76%
Light Crude Oil : $50.66/BBL 0.21%
Natural Gas : $2.959/MMBtu 0.30%
Updated in last 24 hours