Anadarko and Chesapeake were among the few to increase hedging in the fourth quarter, according to a Reuters analysis of filings from the largest shale firms.
NEW YORK, March 16 (Reuters) - Last October, as U.S. oil prices seemed to be stabilizing around $45 a barrel, some bullish traders chuckled at the notion of U.S. shale firms racing to hedge production at what they thought was the bottom of a 19-month rout.
Now, a handful of producers, such as Anadarko Petroleum, which sporadically hedges in large chunks every few quarters, and, surprisingly, natural gas giant Chesapeake Energy, may have the last laugh.
They were among the few to increase hedging in the fourth quarter, according to a Reuters analysis of filings from the largest shale firms. That group locked in prices for nearly 38 million barrels of future production just before crude tumbled a further $15 a barrel in the early weeks of 2016.
However, the figures show that, taken together, the 28 analyzed companies ended the quarter with some 28 million fewer hedged barrels, totaling 291 million, than when they started. Analysts estimate that between 15 and 20 percent of 2016 U.S. oil production is hedged, and as little as 2 percent for 2017.
In addition, at the end of 2015, some 44 percent of the group's outstanding hedge book was concentrated in the hands of just eight U.S. shale oil companies that increased their outstanding oil options, swaps or other hedging positions.
In the third quarter, amid an almost uninterrupted decline in prices, only six companies had boosted their hedge positions.
The data underscores a growing chasm between those that remain hedged and producers that lack such protection, raising doubts how long the latter can survive the lower-for-longer price scenario.
"The path higher for prices will be fairly slow and steady because once we get back to the $45-$50 range, you'll hit a wall of financial hedges that will cap prices," said Michael Tran, director of commodity strategy at RBC Capital Markets, who expects the market to rebalance in the second half of the year.
In all, 16 companies ended the quarter with hedging positions reduced by a total 66 million barrels, mostly as a result of expiring hedges - a long-anticipated trend that leaves most of the industry with little insurance to ride out a market expected to trade below $40 a barrel through the year.
Foremost among those opting out of further hedges was Devon Energy, which let insurance on some 14 million barrels expire in the fourth quarter. Last month, Devon said that it would slash its dividend and capital spending by 75 percent and lay off a fifth of its staff.
Analysts who track shale producers say sufficient cash flow that hedging can provide is key to a company's health and ability to sustain production, yet most producers chose not to do so.
For cash-strapped drillers, hedging may have simply become too expensive, analysts say. Some producers also seem perpetually bullish and have passed up opportunities to hedge even at $20 or $30 above spot prices in recent quarters, betting prices will soon recover.
Now, analysts say those producers may need to rethink their strategies.
"We're seeing sharp cuts from some producers this year in both cash and budgets," said John Saucer, an analyst at Mobius Risk Group in Houston. "At the end of the day, the lack of hedging has come back to get them."
Despite oil prices bouncing to nearly $40 this past week, some traders say ballooning inventories suggest further declines ahead.
In a note on Friday, Goldman Sachs cut its 2016 price forecast by $7 to $38 a barrel, adding that the recent rally would prove "self-defeating" as sustained low prices are necessary to finish supply-demand rebalancing.
Those who boosted hedging include QEP Resources, which added 3.3 million barrels for a total of 6.6 million barrels for 2016 at $58, along with 2.6 million barrels for 2017 at $54. Carrizo Oil & Gas added nearly 2.3 million barrels at an average price of $60.
Chesapeake Energy also added 4.4 million barrels.
The problem is that decade-low prices mean some producers simply cannot afford to hedge because the prices remain below marginal costs.
In a recent conference call, Anadarko's chief executive told analysts he did not think "any company has got a motivation to hedge" at $30 oil.
View Full Article
Copyright 2016 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions.
WHAT DO YOU THINK?
Click on the button below to add a comment.
Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.
Most Popular Articles
From the Career Center
Jobs that may interest you