Kemp: Forward Oil Prices Anchor Around $75
John Kemp is a Reuters market analyst. The views expressed are his own
LONDON, May 1 (Reuters) - Market participants expect the price of Brent to average around $75 per barrel through the rest of the decade, not much above the current level.
Spot Brent prices have risen around $20 per barrel from their mid-January low, from $46 to $66, an increase of more than 40 percent.
Over the same period, however, futures prices for oil delivered at the end of 2017 have increased just $4.50 per barrel and remain semi-fixed a little over $70.
As spot prices have risen, the slope of the forward curve has become flatter, ensuring prices for 2017 and beyond are almost unchanged (http://link.reuters.com/jyr64w).
Analysts tend to cite the curve selectively, quoting it when it coincides with their own view and ignoring it when the curve is at variance with their forecasts.
In any case, the forward curve is a notoriously poor predictor. Back in June 2014, it pointed to an oil price around $100 per barrel at the end of 2017. There is no evidence the market can successfully anticipate prices more than about 6 months ahead.
And the curve is not a consensus forecast. The curve is what traders bet against. There will be as many traders who believe prices will be above the curve as below it. For a market to exist there must be uncertainty and a diversity of views.
That said, the curve can provide some indication about the state of market views on average. At the moment it indicates many market participants think oil prices will trade around $75 for the next few years.
That level corresponds roughly to most estimates of the breakeven price needed to sustain modest growth in global oil production.
Published estimates by industry sources range from a marginal cost of $55 or $65 to as much as $75 or $85 per barrel.
Forward prices have settled in the centre of this range, which suggests marginal cost estimates are acting as an anchor for expectations.
Those expectations appear roughly reasonable. North Dakota's Department of Mineral Resources estimates the state's shale producers need at WTI price of $65 per barrel to sustain their current output of 1.2 million barrels per day.
Cost reduction throughout the supply chain should help lower the marginal cost of production in the next 2-3 years, which could pull medium-term prices below their current level.
On the other hand, if Brent prices stabilise around $75, growth in oil demand, which has been subdued, is likely to accelerate, tending to push up prices in the medium term.
There is no such thing as an "equilibrium" price in the oil market. Supply and demand are characterised by long lags and deep cycles which ensure prices are always unstable in the medium and long term.
But as a very rough estimate for planning and investing purposes, assuming an average of $75 per barrel over the next 3-4 years is reasonable (though that could just be me invoking the forward curve as it agrees with my own assessment).
Prices much above that level look unsustainable because they would encourage too much new supply, especially from the shale sector, and restrain demand.
Prices much below look equally unstable because they would not sustain healthy capital investment and boost demand too much.
The only certainty is that predictions about oil prices are always wrong (newspapers and academic books are littered with dozens of forecasts that went badly awry and it is hubris to assume this time will be any different).
But if you want a figure to plug into a medium-term model, $75 is not a bad place to start.
(Editing by Gareth Jones)
WHAT DO YOU THINK?
Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.
- Weatherford CEO's Rebound Plan Relies On Getting Smaller
- Iran Says Oil Market Is Too Tight For US Zero Exports Target
- China's Squeezed 'Teapots' Eye Petchem Path To Riches
- Baker Hughes: US Drillers Add Oil Rigs For Second Week In Three
- Venezuela Hands China More Oil Presence, But No Mention Of New Funds
- Falcon Oil Declares Commercial Flow Test Results for Shenandoah Well
- Japan Failing to Meet Corporate Demand for Clean Power: Amazon
- Macquarie Strategists Expect Brent Oil Price to Grind Higher
- UK Oil Regulator Publishes New Emissions Reduction Plan
- PetroChina Posts Higher Annual Profit on Higher Production
- McDermott Settles Reficar Dispute
- US, SKorea Launch Task Force to Stop Illicit Refined Oil Flows into NKorea
- Pennsylvania County Joins List of Local Govts Suing Big Oil over Climate
- Russian Navy Enters Warship-Crowded Red Sea Amid Houthi Attacks
- USA Commercial Crude Oil Inventories Increase
- New China Climate Chief Says Fossil Fuels Must Keep a Role
- Equinor Makes Discovery in North Sea
- Standard Chartered Reiterates $94 Brent Call
- India Halts Russia Oil Supplies From Sanctioned Tanker Giant
- DOI Announces Proposal for Second GOM Offshore Wind Auction
- Centcom, Dryad Outline Recent Moves Around Red Sea Region
- PetroChina Set to Receive Venezuelan Oil
- Czech Conglomerate to Buy Major Stake in Gasnet for $917MM
- US DOE Offers $44MM in Funding to Boost Clean Power Distribution
- Oil Settles Lower as Stronger Dollar Offsets Tighter Market
- Chinese Mega Company Makes Major Oilfield Discovery
- VIDEO: Missile Attack Kills Crew Transiting Gulf of Aden
- Norway Regulator Blasts Proposal to Halt New Oil and Gas Permits
- Chinese Mega Company Makes Another Major Oilfield Discovery
- What Is the Biggest Risk to Offshore Oil and Gas Personnel in 2024?
- New China Climate Chief Says Fossil Fuels Must Keep a Role
- Vessel Sinks in Red Sea After Missile Strike
- Exxon Rights in Stabroek Do Not Apply to Hess Merger with Chevron: Hess
- Analysts Reveal Latest Oil Price Outlook Following OPEC+ Cut Extension
- Equinor Makes Discovery in North Sea