Australia's Neon Energy Limited reported Wednesday that further to the announcement of Nov. 13, the firm has received notice from Evoworld Corporation Pty Ltd (Evoworld), advising the former of its current intention to call and arrange a general meeting of Neon Energy, pursuant to section 249F of the Corporations Act, Jan. 14, 2015.
The Board of Neon Energy understands that Evoworld intends to send a Notice of Meeting to Neon Energy shareholders in due course. As previously announced, Evoworld has indicated that it will put resolutions to the meeting on various matters, including the proposed merger with MEO Australia Limited (MEO), the removal of the existing Directors, and the appointment of Evoworld nominees Timothy Kestell, Peter Pynes and Ross Williams as Directors of Neon Energy. Regrettably, however, to date Evoworld has not provided any further details of its proposed resolutions.
This latest move from Evoworld follows the defeat of all of Evoworld’s resolutions at the Company general meetings held Nov. 12. At those meetings Neon Energy shareholders voted comprehensively against Evoworld’s proportional takeover offer, and against Evoworld’s resolutions to replace the current Directors of Neon Energy with their own nominees.
While the vote at the Requisitioned Meeting to consider resolutions to replace the Board was relatively close in terms of votes cast, a more detailed review of the results shows the comprehensive support for Neon Energy’s current Board and strategy:
Based upon these results the Board of Neon Energy believes it has received a clear mandate, from a large proportion of its shareholders, to proceed with its recommended growth strategy; the proposed merger with MEO Australia Limited (MEO). Despite this fact, Neon Energy has become aware that Evoworld has recently written to Neon Energy shareholders. In its letter entitled “A Call to Arms to all Neon Energy Shareholders” Evoworld seeks to undermine the
Evoworld question how the transaction can be a “merger of equals” citing MEO’s cash balance of $9.99 million (AUD 11.7 million) relative to Neon’s $21.61 million (AUD 25.3 million).
Evoworld fails to acknowledge the fact that MEO brings a substantial asset and new venture opportunity portfolio, to be funded with Neon Energy’s cash and creating a mutually beneficial arrangement that justifies the equal valuation placed upon the two companies. The merger of equals is based upon what both companies bring to the merged group, not only their cash balances.
View Full Article
WHAT DO YOU THINK?
Click on the button below to add a comment.
Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.
Most Popular Articles
From the Career Center
Jobs that may interest you