New York's Highest Court to Rule on Towns' Fracking Bans

Article title
The NY Court of Appeals will decide whether two towns can ban fracking within their boundaries using zoning laws.

The New York Court of Appeals, the highest court in the state, heard oral arguments this week in two cases regarding whether municipalities can use local zoning laws to prohibit hydraulic fracturing within the city boundaries, or whether the state’s law regulating oil and gas development within the state preempts a municipality’s local zoning laws.

Presenting their cases before the seven judges on the bench, attorneys for the upstate New York towns of Dryden and Middlefield argued on the side of local zoning laws being able to prohibit oil and gas activities within a municipality’s boundaries, while a trustee for Oslo, Norway-based Norse Energy challenged the Dryden ban. Cooperstown Holstein, a dairy farm that leased land for drilling, challenged the ban by Middlefield.

Lower courts had found no express or implied preemption. The Appellate Division, Third Department affirmed in May 2013 earlier Supreme Court decisions that dismissed both lawsuits, finding that the zoning ordinances were not intended to be preempted by the state’s Oil, Gas and Solution Mining Law (OGSML).

The cases, which are expected to be decided within a month, might seem simple, but the stakes are high, with potentially far-reaching ramifications for the energy industry, and for environmentalists, Michael Joy, Reed Smith Oil & Gas partner, told Rigzone.  

“New York is the hotbed of the anti-fracking movement,” Joy, who helped frame some of the key arguments while representing Lenape in lawsuits against Avon and other townships in New York, said.

However the case is decided, it won’t resolve New York’s 6-year, statewide moratorium on shale gas development. Governor Andrew Cuomo, who inherited the ban that began in 2008, said the ban would not be lifted until a health impact review undertaken in 2012 is completed.

The case has significance well beyond the New York state line, Joy said.

“If the lower court rulings are upheld, the anti-fracking movement would be encouraged and invigorated to export the issue to other locales, such as Colorado or Pennsylvania, where there is already strong anti-fracking sentiment,” Joy said. “There is always some tension between state law and ‘my back yard’ issues.”

There are currently more than 75 towns in New York that have banned fracking. A ban against fracking would not have to be successful state-wide in order to be effective, Joy said.

“If one town were to place a ban on, say, the transport of trucks carrying fracking waste water to injection well sites, the route around the town might be so long that the cost to do fracking in the area would be prohibitive. An inconsistent patchwork of municipalities against fracking could effectively discourage the industry from fracking within the state,” he said. “The effect that that would have on the industry is not unintentional.”

Upholding the lower court decisions would be a blow not only to energy companies, but also to property owners in central New York who are willing to lease land to production companies, Joy said. There is extensive shale gas in the Marcellus Shale formation, which extend over parts of Pennsylvania, West Virginia, southeast Ohio and upstate New York. Because of hydraulic fracturing, the 104,000-square mile Marcellus Shale is thought to hold the largest volume of recoverable natural gas in the United States, with an estimated 141 trillion cubic feet of recoverable natural gas as of 2012, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA).



WHAT DO YOU THINK?


Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.


Most Popular Articles