Halliburton Working with the Govt to Resolve Billing Issues
Halliburton
Halliburton's KBR subsidiary would like to set the record straight
regarding misleading and inaccurate reports on billing issues related to
dining facilities in Iraq and Kuwait. KBR is working with the U.S. Army Field
Support Command (AFSC) to resolve outstanding issues regarding invoices
submitted by KBR's dining facility subcontractors in Iraq and Kuwait. At this
time, no final decision has been made.
As announced on May 17, 2004, the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) has recommended the suspension, pending further review, of $159.5 million of KBR's billings for dining facility costs in Iraq. This is a reduction in the amount of dining facilities costs that had previously been suspended of $177 million. This previous amount included $35.8 million of costs suspended by DCAA, plus $140.7 million of dining facilities billings that were voluntarily deferred by KBR. After a thorough review, KBR concluded that the entire $140.7 million of dining facility costs was fully justified, and this amount was included in a billing at the end of April under KBR's LOGCAP III project.
Although the DCAA's action in recommending the suspense of the $159.5 million was not unexpected based on the DCAA's prior actions, KBR is disappointed that the DCAA continues to ignore the fact that KBR is contractually required to feed and support a minimum level of troops. It is necessary for KBR to contract based on a minimum number of troops so that the dining facility can be sized and equipped accordingly, and this is the basis for the subcontractor billings to KBR which KBR in turn bills to the military. At times this contractual minimum has been greater than the actual recorded headcount for meals at the dining facilities. In working with the DCAA, KBR prepared an analysis of the difference between how many people entered the dining facilities and the amount KBR billed to the government under the terms of the contract, yielding a 19.4% difference. KBR did this analysis to support DCAA while clearly stating that this basis of calculation, while interesting, was not the basis for the subcontracts nor the basis for billings to the government. The DCAA has apparently used this 19.4% difference to calculate the $159.5 million in its recommended suspension of dining facility cost. The DCAA audit opinion is preliminary and only a recommendation. KBR strongly believes DCAA's view is not supported by the contract. The ultimate decision regarding the payment of these costs will be made by KBR's customer, the Army Material Command (AMC).
KBR believes that it will ultimately be reimbursed for these costs because its contractual position is strong. KBR's actions were consistent with its prime contract with the AMC, and KBR continues to work with its customer to achieve resolution on this issue.
If these costs are not paid by the Government, KBR will withhold payment from subcontractors. KBR does not believe this will have a significant or sustained impact on its liquidity.
KBR has a contract with the government in which it is required to provide a turn-key, fully operational and independent, quality dining facility for a minimum number of Government personnel in a war zone. In fact, the Army required KBR to provide 27 of these facilities throughout Iraq to support over 120,000 troops -- in less than 3 weeks.
"KBR has been working with AFSC to develop a standardized process for resolution of issues which arise throughout the contract. We believe that our efforts to establish these types of check and balance review processes early on in the program are just a part of the way the military and private contractors will be working together in the future," said Randy Harl, KBR president and CEO.
"KBR is committed to continuing to work cooperatively with the Army to resolve this issue," said Harl. "In general, we have found that the subcontractors are properly billing on the basis provided in the subcontracts, and in a manner than conforms to the LOGCAP prime contract. We are operating in a remote, hostile and ever-changing environment in Iraq. In such an environment, there are bound to be challenges. However, what is most important here is that the soldiers are being fed well. Any issues related to billings will not only be resolved quickly and responsibly, but also resolved in such a way that it will not affect any services provided to our soldiers."
KBR employees have had a significant and positive impact on the quality of life for troops and are risking their lives everyday. Civilian contractors work side-by-side with the military and Iraqi people. KBR's work is difficult and in a dangerous environment, and Halliburton and its subcontractors have lost 35 personnel while performing services under our contracts in the Kuwait- Iraq region.
As announced on May 17, 2004, the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) has recommended the suspension, pending further review, of $159.5 million of KBR's billings for dining facility costs in Iraq. This is a reduction in the amount of dining facilities costs that had previously been suspended of $177 million. This previous amount included $35.8 million of costs suspended by DCAA, plus $140.7 million of dining facilities billings that were voluntarily deferred by KBR. After a thorough review, KBR concluded that the entire $140.7 million of dining facility costs was fully justified, and this amount was included in a billing at the end of April under KBR's LOGCAP III project.
Although the DCAA's action in recommending the suspense of the $159.5 million was not unexpected based on the DCAA's prior actions, KBR is disappointed that the DCAA continues to ignore the fact that KBR is contractually required to feed and support a minimum level of troops. It is necessary for KBR to contract based on a minimum number of troops so that the dining facility can be sized and equipped accordingly, and this is the basis for the subcontractor billings to KBR which KBR in turn bills to the military. At times this contractual minimum has been greater than the actual recorded headcount for meals at the dining facilities. In working with the DCAA, KBR prepared an analysis of the difference between how many people entered the dining facilities and the amount KBR billed to the government under the terms of the contract, yielding a 19.4% difference. KBR did this analysis to support DCAA while clearly stating that this basis of calculation, while interesting, was not the basis for the subcontracts nor the basis for billings to the government. The DCAA has apparently used this 19.4% difference to calculate the $159.5 million in its recommended suspension of dining facility cost. The DCAA audit opinion is preliminary and only a recommendation. KBR strongly believes DCAA's view is not supported by the contract. The ultimate decision regarding the payment of these costs will be made by KBR's customer, the Army Material Command (AMC).
KBR believes that it will ultimately be reimbursed for these costs because its contractual position is strong. KBR's actions were consistent with its prime contract with the AMC, and KBR continues to work with its customer to achieve resolution on this issue.
If these costs are not paid by the Government, KBR will withhold payment from subcontractors. KBR does not believe this will have a significant or sustained impact on its liquidity.
KBR has a contract with the government in which it is required to provide a turn-key, fully operational and independent, quality dining facility for a minimum number of Government personnel in a war zone. In fact, the Army required KBR to provide 27 of these facilities throughout Iraq to support over 120,000 troops -- in less than 3 weeks.
"KBR has been working with AFSC to develop a standardized process for resolution of issues which arise throughout the contract. We believe that our efforts to establish these types of check and balance review processes early on in the program are just a part of the way the military and private contractors will be working together in the future," said Randy Harl, KBR president and CEO.
"KBR is committed to continuing to work cooperatively with the Army to resolve this issue," said Harl. "In general, we have found that the subcontractors are properly billing on the basis provided in the subcontracts, and in a manner than conforms to the LOGCAP prime contract. We are operating in a remote, hostile and ever-changing environment in Iraq. In such an environment, there are bound to be challenges. However, what is most important here is that the soldiers are being fed well. Any issues related to billings will not only be resolved quickly and responsibly, but also resolved in such a way that it will not affect any services provided to our soldiers."
KBR employees have had a significant and positive impact on the quality of life for troops and are risking their lives everyday. Civilian contractors work side-by-side with the military and Iraqi people. KBR's work is difficult and in a dangerous environment, and Halliburton and its subcontractors have lost 35 personnel while performing services under our contracts in the Kuwait- Iraq region.
Most Popular Articles
- How Likely Is an All-Out War in the Middle East Involving the USA?
- Rooftop Solar Now 4th Largest Source of Electricity in Australia
- US Confirms Reimposition of Oil Sanctions against Venezuela
- EU, Industry Players Ink Charter to Meet Solar Energy Targets
- Analyst Says USA Influence on Middle East Seems to be Fading
- Russian Ships to Remain Banned from US Ports
- Brazil Court Reinstates Petrobras Chair to Divided Board
- EIB Lends $425.7 Million for Thuringia's Grid Upgrades
- Var Energi Confirms Oil Discovery in Ringhorne
- Seatrium, Shell Strengthen Floating Production Systems Collaboration
- An Already Bad Situation in the Red Sea Just Got Worse
- What's Next for Oil? Analysts Weigh In After Iran's Attack
- USA Regional Banks Dramatically Step Up Loans to Oil and Gas
- EIA Raises WTI Oil Price Forecasts
- How Likely Is an All-Out War in the Middle East Involving the USA?
- Venezuela Authorities Arrest Two Senior Energy Officials
- Namibia Expects FID on Potential Major Oil Discovery by Yearend
- Oil Markets Were Already Positioned for Iran Attack
- Is The Iran Nuclear Deal Revival Project Dead?
- Petrobras Chairman Suspended
- Oil and Gas Executives Predict WTI Oil Price
- An Already Bad Situation in the Red Sea Just Got Worse
- New China Climate Chief Says Fossil Fuels Must Keep a Role
- Oil and Gas Execs Reveal Where They See Henry Hub Price Heading
- Equinor Makes Discovery in North Sea
- Macquarie Strategists Warn of Large Oil Price Correction
- DOI Announces Proposal for Second GOM Offshore Wind Auction
- Standard Chartered Reiterates $94 Brent Call
- Chevron, Hess Confident Embattled Merger Will Close Mid-2024
- Analysts Flag 'Remarkable Feature' of 2024 Oil Price Rally