Finance & Investing
News Services
Newsletters
Get free industry updates via email.
Daily News
Weekly News
Equipment Updates
Weekly Job Register
Monthly Event Guide
Our privacy
pledge.


advertisement

BP Files Motion to Establish No. of Barrels for Macondo CWA Penalty

change text size

Deepwater Horizon Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill

BP on Friday filed a motion seeking to establish that the number of barrels of oil to be used for purposes of calculating Clean Water Act (CWA) civil penalties related to the Deepwater Horizon incident is substantially lower than the U.S. government's public estimates.

The company is seeking to establish this fact in the second phase of the limitation and liability trial in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, which is set to begin in September of this year.

"The oil that BP successfully captured from the Macondo reservoir without it entering the Gulf of Mexico waters should not be considered in the court's future determination of Clean Water Act civil penalties," said BP spokesperson Scott Dean in an email statement to Rigzone.

Under the Clean Water Act, civil penalties are assessed only on oil that has actually entered the environment and caused harm. "The government has already acknowledged that over 810,000 barrels of oil were recovered directly from the wellhead. BP therefore seeks to narrow the issues in dispute by showing that whatever the final number of barrels released from the reservoir is proven to be, BP should not be liable for civil penalties for at least 810,000 barrels of captured oil," Dean commented.

BP said in the filing that it does not dispute that a larger amount of oil was discharged into the Gulf of Mexico. The company also said it was aware that the Flow Rate Technical Group (FRTG) on Aug. 2, 2010, issued a 4.9 million barrel estimate of the total amount of oil that had escaped the reservoir, considering both oil that was collected and oil that entered the Gulf.

"To be sure, BP continues to believe that the FRTG's 4.9-million barrel estimate significantly overstates the size of the spill. But the important point is that this disagreement over the size of the spill is a matter for resolution in the Phase 2 trial," BP said in the filing.

BP commented that treating the collected oil no differently from oil that had entered the water would undoubtedly discourage parties potentially liable for penalties arising from future spills from expending resources to collect oil that might otherwise be spilled.

"Surely, neither BP in this spill nor a future defendant in some future spill should be penalized for not only trying to do the right thing, but successfully doing the right thing and keeping oil out of the marine environment," BP commented in the filing.



Karen Boman has more than 10 years of experience covering the upstream oil and gas sector. Email Karen at kboman@rigzone.com.

WHAT DO YOU THINK?

Post a Comment Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.
exBP and glad to be ex | Jan. 16, 2013
All Oil that enters the environment causes harm. Because the oil was removed doesnt mean the residue left behind isnt causing damage to the aquatic ecosystem. Oil spills into ground water does as well. BP should also be charged for the cheap dispersants that were deemed harmful to the environment that they used.They should also be charged for their lack of response time that left oil in the environment longer than dealing with it more effectively thus causing more damage. Lets put a glass of water in front of BP management with a mixture of crude and water, remove the crude and see if they will drink it, if the residue left behind in the glass is not harmful. Most aquaic life is not as strong as humans which is why fish from the gulf are not as healthy as they were before the spill. If the goverment wants to fix things now and in the future then start with applying the Clean Water Act as it should be and recognise that every drop that entered the water is causing harm regardless of it being recovered. Also, run BP out of the US because incompetence by BP cannot be cleaned up when it is engrained in the fabric of the company and management that continues to operate on arrogance and ignorance.



Deepwater Horizon Images
Subsea Dispersan Injection System Macondo BOP Oil Leak Deepwater Horizon Deck Burning (Apr 22) Deepwater Horizon Sinking (Apr 22)
Overview Diagram of Repair Efforts  Deepwater Horizon in Flames (Apr 20) Macondo BOP Stack Macondo Cofferdam Structure
71 more images view image library

From the Career Center
Jobs that may interest you
Division Order Analyst
Expertise: Lease Analyst
Location: Denver, CO
 
Specialist - Trade Compliance - Import
Expertise: Logistics Management
Location: Houston, TX
 
Senior Contracts Negotiator
Expertise: Contracts Administration
Location: Denver, CO
 
search for more jobs