U.S. High Court Rejects Chevron Challenge on Ecuadorean Judgment

U.S. High Court Rejects Chevron Challenge on Ecuadorean Judgment

WASHINGTON - The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday refused to consider Chevron Corp.'s bid to block the collection of a $19 billion Ecuadorean environmental judgment against the company.

Chevron was seeking to bar a group of Ecuadorean plaintiffs from collecting the money in the U.S. or against its affiliated companies in other nations.

The plaintiffs said in response that the company's quest to block enforcement of the ruling anywhere in the world was radical and unprecedented.

An Ecuadorean court handed down the judgment in 2011, finding Texaco Inc.'s oil exploration was responsible for pollution in the country's Amazon region. Chevron acquired Texaco in 2001, years after the company ceased its oil-drilling operations in Ecuador. Chevron argued the judgment was procured by fraud and was the product of an Ecuadorean judicial system that was neither impartial nor fair.

A New York federal trial judge sided with Chevron in March 2011, issuing a preliminary injunction that barred the plaintiffs from seeking to enforce the judgment anywhere outside of Ecuador. But several months later, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals threw out the injunction, saying the lower-court judge had no power to "declare a foreign judgment null and void for all purposes in all countries." The appeals court also said the trial judge couldn't preempt the plaintiffs from attempting to pursue Chevron in New York.

The Supreme Court, in a short written order, left the 2nd Circuit ruling in place and rejected Chevron's appeal without comment.

Chevron has brought other claims against the plaintiffs and their lawyers, arguing they engaged in fraud and extortion to shake down the company. Those claims are still proceeding in federal court.

The case is Chevron Corp. v. Naranjo, 11-1428.

Copyright (c) 2012 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

WHAT DO YOU THINK?

Click on the button below to add a comment.
Post a Comment
Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.
Rafael Serrano | Oct. 11, 2012
This case is very complicated and not only Chevron had a "wild" litigation but the pretension to void the execution of a court because "its impossible to obtain justice in Ecuador" is not only absurd but also racist

Wendy Weinbaum | Oct. 10, 2012
I think it is most unseemly of the US Judiciary to violate Chevron in public! But I expect that from the 3rd world "courts".


Related Companies
Events  SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Our Privacy Pledge
SUBSCRIBE



Most Popular Articles

From the Career Center
Jobs that may interest you
Intelligence & Risk Assessment Analyst
Expertise: Legal|Risk Management
Location: San Ramon, CA
 
Substation Compliance (PRC) Analyst Job
Expertise: Business Analyst|Regulatory Compliance
Location: Denver, CO
 
Land GIS Spatial Analyst - Mineral Land
Expertise: Contracts Engineer|Geologist|Lease Analyst
Location: Denver, CO
 
search for more jobs

Brent Crude Oil : $48.6/BBL 1.12%
Light Crude Oil : $46.34/BBL 1.24%
Natural Gas : $2.9/MMBtu 2.35%
Updated in last 24 hours