Don't display this message again [x]

Dear User,

On March 28, 2015 OilCareers and Rigzone will be coming together to provide you with access to the world’s largest resource for Oil and Gas news, jobs and industry insights.

We have recently updated our Terms & Conditions to accommodate these changes. Please read them carefully. By using the Site, you agree to be bound by these terms and conditions. These Terms and Conditions are effective as of March 30, 2015.

Finance & Investing
News Services
Get free industry updates via email.
Daily News
Weekly News
Equipment Updates
Weekly Job Register
Monthly Event Guide
Our privacy


USGS Report Shows No Evidence Linking Hydraulic Fracturing to Water

change text size

The two reports released by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Wednesday provide no evidence that hydraulic fracturing has created impacts to groundwater, an EnCana Corp. spokesperson told Rigzone Friday.

"Furthermore and more importantly, [Environmental Protection Agency] has provided no sound scientific evidence that drilling has impacted domestic drinking water wells in the area," said spokesperson Doug Hock in an email statement.

On Wednesday, the USGS released reports outlining tests it had conducted in April on two U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) monitoring wells at Encana's Pavilion gas field in Wyoming.

Hock said there was nothing surprising about the USGS results, noting that USGS did a credible job of sampling, said Hock.

"More importantly, however, is the fact that USGS only sampled one of the two EPA monitoring wells (MW). This goes to the heart of concerns raised previously by state and federal agencies as well as Encana," said Hock.

The USGS report seemed to indicate that the agency declined to sample MW02 because the well could not provide a sample that was representative of actual water quality conditions, Hock said.

EPA has said that the USGS results are "generally consistent" with their own prior sampling, Hock noted. However, Encana's comparison of EPA's sampling of MW01 with the USGS sampling of the same well provides "a good reality check" on this statement.

A comparison of EPA reported detections in EPA Well MW01 and USGS results show that the USGS results are inconsistent with the EPA results on the levels of toluene, xylenes, isopropanol, diethylene glycol, triethylene glycol, 2-Butoxyethanol and acetone. The USGS did not detect these in its tests.

For two components - potassium and DRO - the USGS results show significant decreases in concentrations versus the EPA results, according to a comparison by Encana of EPA and USGS data.

With regard to its claims related to hydraulic fracturing, EPA has contended that the elevated pH levels are due to potassium hydroxide, which is sometimes used in hydraulic fracturing. However, potassium hydroxide was not used in hydraulic fracturing jobs in the Pavilion field and would actually have been detrimental to the types of fracs done in the Pavilion, said Hock.

"The elevated pH is more logically explained by the fact that EPA used cement slurry in setting the casing of its monitoring wells and screens without the use of a bentonite plug to keep the cement from leaking into the well itself," said Hock.

The plus is required for monitoring well construction for USGS and the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality.

"The slurry entering the well is also the reason that clean samples couldn't be obtained from MW02," said Hock.

Karen Boman has more than 10 years of experience covering the upstream oil and gas sector. Email Karen at


Post a Comment Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.
Phil Laudicina | Oct. 2, 2012
This will not stop the EPA from implementing regulations that will make fracking extremely exensive and uneconomical if Obama is re-elected.

randy | Oct. 1, 2012
Unfortunately, the facts just dont seem to matter. The state of Wyoming is yet to "weigh in" but regardless of the scientific evidence, none of the peer review or anything else will register with the hard core environmental types. They are the proverbial "one trick pony." So, unfortunately, I just see endless debate & continued misguided activity with this case at Pavillion. Just a shame...

Related Companies

Most Popular Articles
From the Career Center
Jobs that may interest you
Sr. Forensic Legal Accountant
Expertise: Accounting or Finance|Financial Audit|Legal
Location: The Woodlands, TX
Process Safety Engineer
Expertise: HSE Manager / Advisor|Process Engineer|Safety Engineering
Location: New Orleans, LA
Sales Manager: Fire Safety Equipment - Maritime
Expertise: Fire Protection|Offshore Position Surveying|Sales & Marketing
Location: New Orleans, LA
search for more jobs