Finance & Investing
News Services
Newsletters
Get free industry updates via email.
Daily News
Weekly News
Equipment Updates
Weekly Job Register
Monthly Event Guide
Our privacy
pledge.


advertisement

Panel: Norway Oil Rig Operations Unnecessarily Expensive

change text size
Panel: Norway Oil Rig Operations Unnecessarily Expensive

OSLO - A panel of Norwegian oil and gas experts said Thursday that the costs of offshore drilling are too high and called for changes in safety rules and workers' conditions to save up to 1 trillion Norwegian kroner ($167.5 billion) and allow greater volumes of oil and gas to be produced.

The panel's recommendations come as Norway grapples with falling output of oil and gas, both of which are mainstays of its economy. Total petroleum production in Norway fell 4% in 2010 and 5% in 2011, so making new discoveries and increasing recovery from existing fields is vital.

"The production on the Norwegian continental shelf is in a heavy fall, and we have serious trouble with the cost curve on the shelf," the panel's leader, Eivind Reiten, told Dow Jones Newswires. He warned of a, "grave danger," that vast resources may remain in the ground forever, at a loss to society, because of, "unnecessarily expensive," production.

Offshore workers' unions warned that safety must not be sacrificed to reduce costs.

Offshore activity is at an all-time high in Norway, with record investments in oil and gas, according to the Norwegian Petroleum Directorate. Licensees are planning to spend NOK96.3 billion on the drilling of production and exploration wells in 2013, according to Norway's statistics agency.

Yet much of the extra investment is absorbed by higher costs. "We see that the cost to drill a production well has doubled [from 2000 to 2010], and this seems to be continuing," said Mr. Reiten, a former energy minister.

Drilling wells is the most expensive part of petroleum extraction, so making cost savings in this area is essential, said Norway's Minister of Petroleum and Energy, Ola Borten Moe.

Rig operations are 40% more expensive on the Norwegian Continental Shelf than on the neighboring U.K. shelf, the panel said in a report. This is mainly due to personnel costs that are $50,000 to $75,000 more per day on a Norwegian rig than in the U.K., it said.

The panel suggested that some of Norway's regulations were unnecessary, such as its safety guidelines on lighting and noise levels. It proposed that rules more in line with those in the U.K. would make it easier to move rigs between the countries without expensive modification.

"Norwegian rules make it very costly to move a rig from the U.K. to Norway," said Bjorn Are Nesgaard, External Affairs Director at the Norwegian unit of Total SA. In some cases, up to $100 million may be spent on modifying a rig for use in Norway. "It should be possible to harmonize the practice of the rules," he said.

A 30% cut in rig costs would save the Norwegian oil and gas sector NOK500 billion "over time," the panel estimated. In addition, cheaper rigs could lead to greater production of higher-cost marginal oil discoveries, whose value is estimated at between NOK50 billion and NOK500 billion, the panel said.

The panel also called for workers to spend more time offshore, which prompted concerns about their safety from union representatives.

"The death risk is four times higher in the U.K. sector than on the Norwegian shelf," said second deputy leader at the Norwegian offshore union Safe, Roy Erling Furre . "A harmonization between Norway and the U.K. worries me, especially in the wake of Deepwater Horizon."

Mr. Furre said that the panel's proposals were, "a serious threat," to Norway's health, environment and safety rules.

He also opposed the panel's calls to change offshore workers' current rotation system, in which they spend two weeks offshore followed by four weeks off. "The current two-four rotation system works well," he said.

The report will now be discussed at a public hearing.

Energy companies Royal Dutch Shell PLC, Centrica PLC, A.P. Moller-Maersk and Statoil ASA were on the panel, along with the Petroleum Directorate and the Petroleum Safety Authority. The only union representative in the panel withdrew during its work because he could not accept the proposed changes in workers' conditions and health and safety rules.

Copyright (c) 2012 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

WHAT DO YOU THINK?

Post a Comment Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.
Andy | Aug. 18, 2012
When a 4:1 fatality ratio is highlighted then the Norwegian present regime makes sense if the "panel experts" of company men are in agreement that "Safety comes first at any expense" Logically the next move would be for the UK sector to follow the safe working example and change to the same rotas therefore creating thousands of new positions in the UK sector. Or is that too simplified ??

Mark | Aug. 17, 2012
I have been around rigs long enough to know there is safety, then over the top knee jerk reaction. I believe in Norway they have a policy that a sling can only be used for a single lift, then the sling has to go get pull tested. Crazy waste of money. I have heard safety as an excuse for everything, thats not safe, this is not safe. Its not safe to sit there and have a hole open twice as long as what it should be either. Get rid of the union as the unions goal isnt to work, its to slow the operation down

Steven Matthews | Aug. 17, 2012
Rather than contemplate changing time offshore on NCS to match UK, how about doing it the other way. I have worked in Norway for 6 years and would never go back to the UK to work it it could be avoided. All the above companies named make vast amounts of money, and should be aiming to bring standards up to the best and not reduce to the worst.

Benjamin Calvin | Aug. 17, 2012
Safety is a bad place to economize. A 4 to 1 ration in death ris is a lot of risk. satndardization of rig fitout would be good, if it would help saftery in the bargain.

carlo capitanio | Aug. 17, 2012
i deeply agree in rotation schedule 2 on 4 off is very good for working offshore , who do not like such rotation can always go to work in west africa . union should keep hard not to change so as in UK service company can force you to stay longer without being paid extra . working life and family should be considered as main reason.

carlo capitanio | Aug. 17, 2012
i deeply agrre in rotation schedule 2 on 4 off is very good for working offshore , who do not like such rotation can always go to work in west africa . union should keep hard not to change so .

B Sandul | Aug. 16, 2012
2 weeks on and 4 weeks off?!! No wonder there is so many expats going there to work on the 4 weeks on, 2 weeks off rotation!


For More Information on the Offshore Rig Fleet:
RigLogix can provide the information that you need about the offshore rig fleet, whether you need utilization and industry trends or detailed reports on future rig contracts. Subscribing to RigLogix will allow you to access dozens of prebuilt reports and build your own custom reports using hundreds of available data columns. For more information about a RigLogix subscription, visit www.riglogix.com.

Most Popular Articles
From the Career Center
Jobs that may interest you
SH&E Representative
Expertise: Safety Training Rep
Location: Dumas, TX
 
QA/QC Coordinator
Expertise: Design Engineer, QA / QC / Inspection
Location: Houston, TX
 
Hydro Excavation Operators (Dickinson ND, Rifle, CO Williston, ND)
Expertise: Heavy Machinery Operator
Location: Williston, ND
 
search for more jobs