'Serious Breaches' Put Transocean on PSA's Watch List

The Petroleum Safety Authority has issued an order to Transocean Offshore Ltd after serious breaches of the regulations were identified during an audit of the company and the company's system for maintenance management in the period Jan. 19 through March 1, 2012.

The audit targeted selected parts of Transocean's maintenance management system, and how it is used and followed up in the organization onshore and offshore.

The audit activity revealed that Transocean's maintenance management system still did not satisfy the regulatory requirements. The activity was carried out in the form of spot checks on a random selection of equipment and documentation.

Examples of important factors include:

  • It emerged during interviews that the new maintenance management system was not very user-friendly.
  • Maintenance programs for a number of equipment units and components were missing.
  • It was difficult to identify and track randomly selected equipment in RMS.
  • It was unclear which method and criteria were used to assess criticality and to determine which equipment/barriers were safety-critical.
  • The facility structure (the hierarchy) does not encompass all equipment in such a way that it can easily be identified in the facility, on drawings and in the PM program.
  • Deficiencies in the maintenance history system.
  • Performance requirements for important barrier elements were not always verified through testing and inspection activities in the maintenance system.

In addition to this, the activity revealed deficiencies in the company's own follow-up, internal audits and completion of modification and maintenance activities.

On this basis, the PSA issued a notification of order to Transocean on 22 March 2012.

In accordance with the notification, the following order has been issued to Transocean:

"Pursuant to Section 69 of the Framework Regulations relating to administrative decisions, cf. Section 6 of the Management Regulations relating to management of health, safety and environment, Section 8 relating to internal requirements and Section 21 relating to follow-up, Transocean Offshore ltd NUF is ordered to initiate the following measures:

  • Review the management system and implement measures so that the company's follow-up systems safeguard the intended needs in all parts of the organisation. This work shall include an investigation of why important deficiencies in the maintenance system were not identified and followed up in connection with the process of implementing a new system (RMS).
  • Draw up a binding plan and schedule for how this work will be carried out and followed up. This plan must be sent to the PSA by 26 April 2012, together with a response to the audit report, cf. Sections 5.1.1, 5.1.2, 5.1.3, 5.1.4 and 5.1.5 of the report.


WHAT DO YOU THINK?


Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.

Ruslan Zakirov  |  April 27, 2012
When I worked for Seadrill, just by pure luck, I disclosed that the preventive maintenance was never scheduled in the PMS for such important system as well control equipment for all new jack-ups. Two old rigs had the preventive maintenance scheduled and followed but new-builts had not. When we opened one BOPs at a workshop it appeared that the maintenance was never done neither in the PMS nor in reality. This covered BOPs, k & c manifold, Koomey unit. The problem of the preventive maintenance nowadays is that we have very limited number of maintenance crew aboard rigs. The other issue reflected here is that the PMS is very complicated (user-unfriendly). So, if you have one computer guy with some technical knowledge you can give more time for maintenance guys to work on the equipment other than spending 50% at the computer, 50% with the equipment that already needs repair or replacement.

Most Popular Articles