Shale Gas a Major Contributor in Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions -API

Natural gas from shale formations represented a walloping $37 billion of the overall $108 billion that the petroleum industry invested in technologies to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions between 2000 and 2010, according to a new report released by the American Petroleum Institute (API) on October 20.

This $108 billion also comprised nearly half of the total estimated $225 invested by all private industry combined and the federal government in GHG-reducing technologies, noted Kyle Isakower, VP of Regulatory and Economic Policy for API. The new report showed a major uptick in such investments from the 2008 study due to the inclusion of shale gas and an increase in federal government spending on GHG emission reduction, Isakower added.

GHG Mitigation Investments In North America 2000 - 2010 (Total Investment = $225 Billion, 2010$)

"Major investments by the oil and natural gas industry included shale gas (especially over the 2009-2010 period), efficiency improvements including combined heat and power, and advanced technology for vehicles. Investments in wind, biofuels and solar were also made," said the study, which was conducted for API by T2 Associates.

"Other private industries' major investments included advanced technology vehicles, efficiency improvements in electricity generation, biofuels, wind and solar," the report continued. "The federal government has spread investment across all technology categories with major investments in energy efficient lighting, wind, solar, biofuels and basic research. It also made significant investments in renewables and efficiency during 2009 and 2010 as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)."

leading ghg mitigation investments in north america 2000 - 2010, 2010$

Technologies' Shares of Investment

Six emission reduction technologies led the way in public and private investment. As measured by expenditure share, these were:

  • Advanced technology vehicles (ATV), 22 percent of total investment or $49.5 billion;
  • Shale gas, 17 percent or $37.7 billion;
  • Energy efficiency, 14 percent or $30.7 billion;
  • Ethanol, 8 percent or $18.4 billion;
  • Wind, 8 percent or $17.4 billion; and,
  • Combined heat and power CHP), 7 percent or $16.3 billion.

These six technologies comprised 76 percent of the estimated total investments, or $170 billion, between 2000 and 2010 period in North America, the report said. Meanwhile, all other technologies (including LNG, fugitive gas reduction and nuclear energy) combined were 24 percent of the estimated total investments.

Emissions-Reducing Impact

Picture 11 million cars off the roads. That's the impact that the above efforts represented just last year, in reducing some 56 million metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions, said API's Isakower.

Specifically, the report noted that fuel substitution accounted for 38 to 46 percent of the emissions reductions between 2008 and 2010. This included projects such as installing better plunger lift seals and improved well completion technology. Another 35 to 45 percent of the reductions came from combined heat and power, also known as cogeneration, projects over the same period. Remaining reductions occurred in the non-hydrocarbon areas, including solar and wind energy for electricity generation, as well as biofuels production.


Click on the button below to add a comment.
Post a Comment
Generated by readers, the comments included herein do not reflect the views and opinions of Rigzone. All comments are subject to editorial review. Off-topic, inappropriate or insulting comments will be removed.
David | Oct. 24, 2011
You have to play to publicity game if the industry is meant to thrive. The science is necessary for operations, the fads are necessary to make people happy. We can no longer be reactive and defensive to public opinions, its time we began to show the public the benefits and good intentions of the petroleum industry.

hosein-davodi | Oct. 22, 2011
With notice of this problem that in short near future,the world population would be very high(enormous)and environmental pollution would be serious and human-life threatening,therefore remarkable reduction of GHG is vital and end-solving practical procedure. As a result,any expenditure and spending money for these institute research centers,are inevitable. On my privateshare, have translated the very useful and practical book of "Environmental control of petroleum engineering" from API.Kind regards

Darryl Gunn | Oct. 21, 2011
API did have a name for technical competence. API should stop trying to promote our industry on the nonsense of CO2 being a significant greenhouse gas. The oil & gas industry requires an understanding of Geological processes and history. Using the latest unscientific fad to promote our industry is to discount the collective knowledge of the professionals working in the oil & gas industry.


Our Privacy Pledge

Most Popular Articles

From the Career Center
Jobs that may interest you
Project Controls Specialist
Expertise: Project Management
Location: Minneapolis
Quality Assurance and Training Specialist Job
Expertise: HR - General|HR - Trainer / Instructor|Risk Management
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Project Manager
Expertise: Engineering Manager|Project Engineer
Location: Columbia, SC
search for more jobs

Brent Crude Oil : $51.46/BBL 0.61%
Light Crude Oil : $50.52/BBL 0.64%
Natural Gas : $2.83/MMBtu 5.35%
Updated in last 24 hours